memoirs of general william t. sherman-2-第95部分

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


cific　Railroad；　and　Lucius　Fairchild；　of　Madison；　Wisconsin。　　I　also　named　General　John　W。　Sprague；　then　employed　by　the　Northern　Pacific　Railroad　in　Washington　Territory。　　General　Grant　knew　them　all　personally；　and　said　if　General　Dodge　were　not　connected　with　the　Union　Pacific　Railroad；　with　which　the　Secretary　of　War　must　necessarily　have　large　transactions；　he　would　choose　him；　but　as　the　case　stood；　and　remembering　the　very　excellent　speech　made　by　General　Belknap　at　the　Chicago　reunion　of　December；　1868；　he　authorized　me　to　communicate　with　him　to　ascertain　if　he　were　willing　to　come　to　Washington　as　Secretary　of　War。　　General　Belknap　was　then　the　collector　of　internal　revenue　at　Keokuk；　Iowa。　　I　telegraphed　him　and　received　a　prompt　and　favorable　answer。　　His　name　was　sent　to　the　Senate；　promptly　confirmed；　and　he　entered　on　his　duties　October　25；1869。　　General　Belknap　surely　had　at　that　date　as　fair　a　fame　as　any　officer　of　volunteers　of　my　personal　acquaintance。　　He　took　up　the　business　where　it　was　left　off；　and　gradually　fell　into　the　current　which　led　to　the　command　of　the　army　itself　as　of　the　legal　and　financial　matters　which　properly　pertain　to　the　War　Department。　　Orders　granting　leaves　of　absence　to　officers；　transfers；　discharges　of　soldiers　for　favor；　and　all　the　old　abuses；　which　had　embittered　the　life　of　General　Scott　in　the　days　of　Secretaries　of　War　Marcy　and　Davis；　were　renewed。　　I　called　his　attention　to　these　facts；　but　without　sensible　effect。　　My　office　was　under　his　in　the　old　War　Department；　and　one　day　I　sent　my　aide…de…camp；　Colonel　Audenried；　up　to　him　with　some　message；　and　when　he　returned　red　as　a　beet；　very　much　agitated；　he　asked　me　as　a　personal　favor　never　again　to　send　him　to　General　Belknap。　　I　inquired　his　reason；　and　he　explained　that　he　had　been　treated　with　a　rudeness　and　discourtesy　he　had　never　seen　displayed　by　any　officer　to　a　soldier。　　Colonel　Audenried　was　one　of　the　most　polished　gentlemen　in　the　army；　noted　for　his　personal　bearing　and　deportment；　and　I　had　some　trouble　to　impress　on　him　the　patience　necessary　for　the　occasion；　but　I　promised　on　future　occasions　to　send　some　other　or　go　myself。　　Things　went　on　from　bad　to　worse；　till　in　1870　I　received　from　Mr。　Hugh　Campbell；　of　St。　Louis；　a　personal　friend　and　an　honorable　gentleman；　a　telegraphic　message　complaining　that　I　had　removed　from　his　position　Mr。　Ward；　post　trader　at　Fort　Laramie；　with　only　a　month　in　which　to　dispose　of　his　large　stock　of　goods；　to　make　room　for　his　successor。

It　so　happened　that　we　of　the　Indian　Peace　Commission　had　been　much　indebted　to　this　same　trader；　Ward；　for　advances　of　flour；　sugar；　and　coffee；　to　provide　for　the　Crow　Indians；　who　had　come　down　from　their　reservation　on　the　Yellowstone　to　meet　us　in　1868；　before　our　own　supplies　had　been　received。　　For　a　time　I　could　not…comprehend　the　nature　of　Mr。　Campbell's　complaint；　so　I　telegraphed　to　the　department　commander；　General　C。　C。　Augur；　at　Omaha；　to　know　if　any　such　occurrence　had　happened；　and　the　reasons　therefor。　　I　received　a　prompt　answer　that　it　was　substantially　true；　and　had　been　ordered　by　The　Secretary　of　War。　　It　so　happened　that　during　General　Grant's　command　of　the　army　Congress　had　given　to　the　general　of　the　army　the　appointment　of　〃post…traders。〃　　He　had　naturally　devolved　it　on　the　subordinate　division　and　department　commanders；　but　the　legal　power　remained　with　the　general　of　the　army。　　I　went　up　to　the　Secretary　of　War；　showed　him　the　telegraphic　correspondence；　and　pointed　out　the　existing　law　in　the　Revised　Statutes。　　General　Belknap　was　visibly　taken　aback；　and　explained　that　he　had　supposed　the　right　of　appointment　rested　with　him；　that　Ward　was　an　old　rebel　Democrat；　etc。；　whereas　Ward　had　been　in　fact　the　sutler　of　Fort　Laramie；　a　United　States　military　post；　throughout　the　civil　war。　　I　told　him　that　I　should　revoke　his　orders；　and　leave　the　matter　where　it　belonged；　to　the　local　council　of　administration　and　commanding　officers。　　Ward　was　unanimously　reelected　and　reinstated。　　He　remained　the　trader　of　the　post　until　Congress　repealed　the　law；　and　gave　back　the　power　of　appointment　to　the　Secretary　of　War；　when　of　course　he　had　to　go。　　But　meantime　he　was　able　to　make　the　necessary　business　arrangements　which　saved　him　and　his　partners　the　sacrifice　which　would　have　been　necessary　in　the　first　instance。　　I　never　had　any　knowledge　whatever　of　General　Belknap's　transactions　with　the　traders　at　Fort　Sill　and　Fort　Lincoln　which　resulted　in　his　downfall。　　I　have　never　sought　to　ascertain　his　motives　for　breaking　with　me；　because　he　knew　I　had　always　befriended　him　while　under　my　military　command；　and　in　securing　him　his　office　of　Secretary　of　War。　　I　spoke　frequently　to　President　Grant　of　the　growing　tendency　of　his　Secretary　of　War　to　usurp　all　the　powers　of　the　commanding　general；　which　would　surely　result　in　driving　me　away。　　He　as　frequently　promised　to　bring　us　together　to　agree　upon　a　just　line　of　separation　of　our　respective　offices；　but　never　did。

Determined　to　bring　the　matter　to　an　issue；　I　wrote　the　following　letter


HEADQUARTERS　ARMY　OF　THE　　UNITED　STATES；　WASHINGTON；　D。　　C。；　August　17；　1870。

General　W。　W。　BELKNAP；　Secretary　of　War。

GENERAL：　I　must　urgently　and　respectfully　invite　your　attention　when　at　leisure　to　a　matter　of　deep　interest　to　future　commanding　generals　of　the　army　more　than　to　myself；　of　the　imperative　necessity　of　fiXing　and　clearly　defining　the　limits　of　the　powers　and　duties　of　the　general　of　the　army　or　of　whomsoever　may　succeed　to　the　place　of　commander…in…chief。

The　case　is　well　stated　by　General　Grant　in　his　letter　of　January　29；　1866；　to　the　Secretary　of　War；　Mr。　Stanton；　hereto　appended；　and　though　I　find　no　official　answer　recorded；　I　remember　that　General　Grant　told　me　that　the　Secretary　of　War　had　promptly　assured　him　in　conversation　that　he　fully　approved　of　his　views　as　expressed　in　this　letter。

At　that　time　the　subject　was　much　discussed；　and　soon　after　Congress　enacted　the　bill　reviving　the　grade　of　general；　which　bill　was　approved　July　25；　1866；　and　provided　that　the　general；　when　commissioned；　may　be　authorized　under　the　direction　and　during　the　pleasure　of　the　President　to　command　the　armies　of　the　United　States；　and　a　few　days　after；　viz。；　July　28；　1866；　was　enacted　the　law　which　defined　the　military　peace　establishment。　　The　enacting　clause　reads：　〃That　the　military　peace　establishment　of　the　United。　States　shall　hereafter　consist　of　five　regiments　of　artillery；　ten　regiments　of　cavalry；　forty…five　regiments　of　infantry；　the　professors　and　Corps　of　Cadets　of　the　United　States　Military　Academy；　and　such　other　forces　as　shall　be　provided　for　by　this　act；　to　be　known　as　the　army　of　the　United　States。〃

The　act　then　recites　in　great　detail　all　the　parts　of　the　army；　making　no　distinction　between　the　line　and　staff；　but　clearly　makes　each　and　every　part　an　element　of　the　whole。

Section　37　provides　for　a　board　to　revise　the　army　regulations　and　report；　and　declares　that　the　regulations　then　in　force；　viz。；　those　of　1863；　should　remain　until　Congress　〃shall　act　on　said　report；〃　and　section　38　and　last　enacts　that　all　laws　and　parts　of　laws　inconsistent　with　the　provisions　of　this　act　be　and　the　same　are　hereby　repealed。

Under　the　provisions　of　this　law　my　predecessor；　General　Grant；　did　not　hesitate　to　command　and　make　orders　to　all　parts　of　the　army；　the　Military　Academy；　and　staff；　and　it　was　under　his　advice　that　the　new　regulations　were　compiled　in　1868　that　drew　the　line　more　clearly　between　the　high　and　responsible　duties　of　the　Secretary　of　War　and　the　general　of　the　army。　　He　assured　me　many　a　time　before　I　was　called　here　to　succeed　him　that　he　wanted　me　to　perfect　the　distinction；　and　it　was　by　his　express　orders　that　on　assuming　the　command　of　the　army　I　specifically　placed　the　heads　of　the　staff　corps　here　in　Washington　in　the　exact　relation　to　the　army　which　they　would　bear　to　an　army　in　the　field。

I　am　aware　that　subsequently；　in　his　orders　of　March　26th；　he　modified　his　former　orders　of　March　5th；　but　only　as　to　the　heads　of　bureaus　in　Washington；　who　have；　he　told　me；　certain　functions　of　office　imposed　on　them　by　special　laws　of　Congress；　which　laws；　of　course；　override　all　orders　and　regulations；　but　I　did　not　either　understand　from　him　in　person；　or　from　General　Rawlins；　at　whose　instance　this　order　was　made；　that　it　was　designed　in　any　way　to　modify；　alter；　or　change　his　purposes　that　division　and　department　commanders；　as　well　as　the　general　of　the　army；　should　exercise　the　same　command　of　the　staff　as　they　did　of　the　line　of　the　army。

I　need　not　remind　the　Secretary　that　orders　and　reports　are　made　to　and　from　the　Military　Academy　which　the　general　does　not　even　see；　though　the　Military　Academy　is　specifically　named　as　a　part　of　that　army　which　he　is　required　to　command。　　Leaves　of　absence　are　granted；　the　stations　of　officers　are　changed；　and　other　orders　are　now　made　directly　to　the　army；　not　through　the　general；　but　direct　through　other　officials　and　the　adjutant…general。

So　long　as　this　is　the　case　I　surely　do　not　command　the　army　of　the　United　States；　and　am　not　responsible　for　it。

I　am　aware　that　the　confusion　results　from　the　fact　that　the　thirty…seventh　section　of　the　act　of　July　28；　1866；　clothes　the　army　regulations　of　1863　with　the　sanction　of　law；　but　the　next　section　repeals　all　laws　and　parts　of　laws　inconsistent　with　the　provisions　of　this　act。　　The　regulations　of　1863　are　but　a　compilation　of　orders　made　prior　to　the　war；　when　such　men　as　Davis　and　Floyd　took　pleasure　in　stripping　General　Scott　of　even　the　semblance　of　power；　and　purposely　reduced　him　to　a　cipher　in　the　command　of　the　army。

Not　one　word　can　be　found　in　those　regulations　speaking　of　the　duties　of　the　lieutenant…general　commanding　the　army；　or　defining　a　single　act　of　authority　rightfully　devolving　on　him。　　Not　a　single　mention　is　made　of　the　rights　and　duties　of　a　commander…in…chief　of　the　army。　　He　is　ignored；　and　purposely；　too；　as　a　part　of　the　programme　resulting　in　the　rebellion；　that　the　army　without　a　legitimate　head　should　pass　into　the　anarchy　which　these　men　were　shaping　for　the　whole　country。

I　invite　your　attention　to　the　a