the writings-3-第16部分

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！



being　struck　at　the　sovereignty　of　the　States　of　this　Union。〃



I　stop　the　quotation　there；　again　requesting　that　it　may　all　be

read。　　I　have　read　all　of　the　portion　I　desire　to　comment　upon。

What　is　this　charge　that　the　Judge　thinks　I　must　have　a　very

corrupt　heart　to　make？　　It　was　a　purpose　on　the　part　of　certain

high　functionaries　to　make　it　impossible　for　the　people　of　one

State　to　prohibit　the　people　of　any　other　State　from　entering　it

with　their　〃property；〃　so　called；　and　making　it　a　slave　State。

In　other　words；　it　was　a　charge　implying　a　design　to　make　the

institution　of　slavery　national。　　And　now　I　ask　your　attention　to

what　Judge　Douglas　has　himself　done　here。　　I　know　he　made　that

part　of　the　speech　as　a　reason　why　he　had　refused　to　vote　for　a

certain　man　for　public　printer；　but　when　we　get　at　it；　the　charge

itself　is　the　very　one　I　made　against　him；　that　he　thinks　I　am　so

corrupt　for　uttering。　　Now；　whom　does　he　make　that　charge

against？　　Does　he　make　it　against　that　newspaper　editor　merely？

No；　he　says　it　is　identical　in　spirit　with　the　Lecompton

Constitution；　and　so　the　framers　of　that　Constitution　are　brought

in　with　the　editor　of　the　newspaper　in　that　〃fatal　blow　being

struck。〃　　He　did　not　call　it　a　〃conspiracy。〃　　In　his　language；　it

is　a　〃fatal　blow　being　struck。〃　　And　if　the　words　carry　the

meaning　better　when　changed　from　a　〃conspiracy〃　into　a　〃fatal

blow　being　struck；　〃I　will　change　my　expression；　and　call　it

〃fatal　blow　being　struck。〃　　We　see　the　charge　made　not　merely

against　the　editor　of　the　Union；　but　all　the　framers　of　the

Lecompton　Constitution；　and　not　only　so；　but　the　article　was　an

authoritative　article。　　By　whose　authority？　　Is　there　any

question　but　he　means　it　was　by　the　authority　of　the　President

and　his　Cabinet；the　Administration？



Is　there　any　sort　of　question　but　he　means　to　make　that　charge？

Then　there　are　the　editors　of　the　Union；　the　framers　of　the

Lecompton　Constitution；　the　President　of　the　United　States　and

his　Cabinet；　and　all　the　supporters　of　the　Lecompton

Constitution；　in　Congress　and　out　of　Congress；　who　are　all

involved　in　this　〃fatal　blow　being　struck。〃　　I　commend　to　Judge

Douglas's　consideration　the　question　of　how　corrupt　a　man's　heart

must　be　to　make　such　a　charge！



Now；　my　friends；　I　have　but　one　branch　of　the　subject；　in　the

little　time　I　have　left；　to　which　to　call　your　attention；　and　as

I　shall　come　to　a　close　at　the　end　of　that　branch；　it　is　probable

that　I　shall　not　occupy　quite　all　the　time　allotted　to　me。

Although　on　these　questions　I　would　like　to　talk　twice　as　long　as

I　have；　I　could　not　enter　upon　another　head　and　discuss　it

properly　without　running　over　my　time。　　I　ask　the　attention　of

the　people　here　assembled　and　elsewhere　to　the　course　that　Judge

Douglas　is　pursuing　every　day　as　bearing　upon　this　question　of

making　slavery　national。　　Not　going　back　to　the　records；　but

taking　the　speeches　he　makes；　the　speeches　he　made　yesterday　and

day　before；　and　makes　constantly　all　over　the　country；　I　ask　your

attention　to　them。　　In　the　first　place；　what　is　necessary　to　make

the　institution　national？　　Not　war。　　There　is　no　danger　that　the

people　of　Kentucky　will　shoulder　their　muskets；　and；　with　a　young

nigger　stuck　on　every　bayonet；　march　into　Illinois　and　force　them

upon　us。　　There　is　no　danger　of　our　going　over　there　and　making

war　upon　them。　　Then　what　is　necessary　for　the　nationalization　of

slavery？　　It　is　simply　the　next　Dred　Scott　decision。　　It　is

merely　for　the　Supreme　Court　to　decide　that　no　State　under　the

Constitution　can　exclude　it；　just　as　they　have　already　decided

that　under　the　Constitution　neither　Congress　nor　the　Territorial

Legislature　can　do　it。　　When　that　is　decided　and　acquiesced　in；

the　whole　thing　is　done。　　This　being　true；　and　this　being　the

way；　as　I　think；　that　slavery　is　to　be　made　national；　let　us

consider　what　Judge　Douglas　is　doing　every　day　to　that　end。　　In

the　first　place；　let　us　see　what　influence　he　is　exerting　on

public　sentiment。　　In　this　and　like　communities；　public　sentiment

is　everything。　　With　public　sentiment；　nothing　can　fail；　without

it；　nothing　can　succeed。　　Consequently；　he　who　moulds　public

sentiment　goes　deeper　than　he　who　enacts　statutes　or　pronounces

decisions。　　He　makes　statutes　and　decisions　possible　or

impossible　to　be　executed。　　This　must　be　borne　in　mind；　as　also

the　additional　fact　that　Judge　Douglas　is　a　man　of　vast

influence；　so　great　that　it　is　enough　for　many　men　to　profess　to

believe　anything　when　they　once　find　out　Judge　Douglas　professes

to　believe　it。　　Consider　also　the　attitude　he　occupies　at　the

head　of　a　large　party；a　party　which　he　claims　has　a　majority　of

all　the　voters　in　the　country。　　This　man　sticks　to　a　decision

which　forbids　the　people　of　a　Territory　from　excluding　slavery；

and　he　does　so；　not　because　he　says　it　is　right　in　itself；he

does　not　give　any　opinion　on　that；but　because　it　has　been

decided　by　the　court；　and　being　decided　by　the　court；　he　is；　and

you　are；　bound　to　take　it　in　your　political　action　as　law；　not

that　he　judges　at　all　of　its　merits；　but　because　a　decision　of

the　court　is　to　him　a　〃Thus　saith　the　Lord。〃　　He　places　it　on

that　ground　alone；　and　you　will　bear　in　mind　that　thus　committing

himself　unreservedly　to　this　decision　commits　him　to　the　next　one

just　as　firmly　as　to　this。　　He　did　not　commit　himself　on　account

of　the　merit　or　demerit　of　the　decision；　but　it　is　a　〃Thus　saith

the　Lord。〃　　The　next　decision；　as　much　as　this；　will　be　a　〃Thus

saith　the　Lord。〃　　There　is　nothing　that　can　divert　or　turn　him

away　from　this　decision。　　It　is　nothing　that　I　point　out　to　him

that　his　great　prototype；　General　Jackson；　did　not　believe　in　the

binding　force　of　decisions。　　It　is　nothing　to　him　that　Jefferson

did　not　so　believe。　　I　have　said　that　I　have　often　heard　him

approve　of　Jackson's　course　in　disregarding　the　decision　of　the

Supreme　Court　pronouncing　a　National　Bank　constitutional。　　He

says　I　did　not　hear　him　say　so。　　He　denies　the　accuracy　of　my

recollection。　　I　say　he　ought　to　know　better　than　I；　but　I　will

make　no　question　about　this　thing；　though　it　still　seems　to　me

that　I　heard　him　say　it　twenty　times。　　I　will　tell　him；　though；

that　he　now　claims　to　stand　on　the　Cincinnati　platform；　which

affirms　that　Congress　cannot　charter　a　National　Bank；　in　the

teeth　of　that　old　standing　decision　that　Congress　can　charter　a

bank。　　And　I　remind　him　of　another　piece　of　history　on　the

question　of　respect　for　judicial　decisions；　and　it　is　a　piece　of

Illinois　history　belonging　to　a　time　when　the　large　party　to

which　Judge　Douglas　belonged　were　displeased　with　a　decision　of

the　Supreme　Court　of　Illinois；　because　they　had　decided　that　a

Governor　could　not　remove　a　Secretary　of　State。　　You　will　find

the　whole　story　in　Ford's　History　of　Illinois；　and　I　know　that

Judge　Douglas　will　not　deny　that　he　was　then　in　favor　of　over…

slaughing　that　decision　by　the　mode　of　adding　five　new　judges；　so

as　to　vote　down　the　four　old　ones。　　Not　only　so；　but　it　ended　in

the　Judge's　sitting　down　on　that　very　bench　as　one　of　the　five

new　judges　to　break　down　the　four　old　ones　　It　was　in　this　way

precisely　that　he　got　his　title　of　judge。　　Now；　when　the　Judge

tells　me　that　men　appointed　conditionally　to　sit　as　members　of　a

court　will　have　to　be　catechized　beforehand　upon　some　subject；　I

say；　〃You　know；　Judge；　you　have　tried　it。〃　　When　he　says　a　court

of　this　kind　will　lose　the　confidence　of　all　men；　will　be

prostituted　and　disgraced　by　such　a　proceeding；　I　say；　〃You　know

best；　Judge；　you　have　been　through　the　mill。〃　　But　I　cannot　shake

Judge　Douglas's　teeth　loose　from　the　Dred　Scott　decision。　　Like

some　obstinate　animal　（I　mean　no　disrespect）　that　will　hang　on

when　he　has　once　got　his　teeth　fixed；　you　may　cut　off　a　leg；　or

you　may　tear　away　an　arm；　still　he　will　not　relax　his　hold。　　And

so　I　may　point　out　to　the　Judge；　and　say　that　he　is　bespattered

all　over；　from　the　beginning　of　his　political　life　to　the　present

time；　with　attacks　upon　judicial　decisions；　I　may　cut　off　limb

after　limb　of　his　public　record；　and　strive　to　wrench　him　from　a

single　dictum　of　the　court；yet　I　cannot　divert　him　from　it。　　He

hangs；　to　the　last；　to　the　Dred　Scott　decision。　　These　things

show　there　is　a　purpose　strong　as　death　and　eternity　for　which　he

adheres　to　this　decision；　and　for　which　he　will　adhere　to　all

other　decisions　of　the　same　court。



＇A　HIBERNIAN：　〃Give　us　something　besides　Dred　Scott。〃＇



Yes；　no　doubt　you　want　to　hear　something　that　don't　hurt。　　Now；

having　spoken　of　the　Dred　Scott　decision；　one　more　word；　and　I　am

done。　　Henry　Clay；　my　beau…ideal　of　a　statesman；　the　man　for　whom

I　fought　all　my　humble　life；　Henry　Clay　once　said　of　a　class　of

men　who　would　repress　all　tendencies　to　liberty　and　ultimate

emancipation　that　they　must；　if　they　would　do　this；　go　back　to

the　era　of　our　Independence；　and　muzzle　the　cannon　which　thunders

its　annual　joyous　return；　they　must　blow　out　the　moral　lights

around　us；　they　must　penetrate　the　human　soul；　and　eradicate

there　the　love　of　liberty；　and　then；　and　not　till　then；　could

they　perpetuate　slavery　in　this　country！　　To　my　thinking；　Judge

Douglas　is；　by　his　example　and　vast　influence；　doing　that　very

thing　in　this　community；　when　he　says　that　the　negro　has　nothing

in　the　Declaration　of　Independence。　　Henry　Clay　plainly

understood　the　contrary。　　Judge　Douglas　is　going　back　to　the　era

of　our　Revolution；　and；　to　the　extent　of　his　ability；　muzzling

the　cannon　which　thunders　its　annual　joyous　return。　　When　he

invites　any　people；　willing　to　have　slavery；　to　establish　it；　he

is　blowing　out　the　moral　lights　around　us。　　When　he　says　he

〃cares　not　whether　slavery　is　voted　down　or　up；〃that　it　is　a

sacred　right　of　self…government；he　is；　in　my　judgment；

penetrating　the　human　soul　and　eradicating　the　light　of　reason

and　the　love　of　liberty　in　this　American　pe