history of philosophy-第71部分

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


been　very　commonly　left　remaining　is　what　is　termed　theism；　faith　in　general；　this　is　the　same
content　which　is　found　also　in　Mohammedanism。　But　along　with　this　attack　upon　religion　on　the
part　of　the　reasoning　understanding　there　has　been　also　a　movement　towards　materialism；　atheism
and　naturalism。　It　is　true　that　we　should　not　make　the　charge　of　atheism　lightly；　for　it　is　a　very
common　occurrence　that　an　individual　whose　ideas　about　God　differ　from　those　of　other　people　is
charged　with　lack　of　religion；　or　even　with　atheism。　But　here　it　really　is　the　case　that　this
philosophy　has　developed　into　atheism；　and　has　defined　matter；　nature；　&c。；　as　that　which　is　to　be
taken　as　the　ultimate；　the　active；　and　the　efficient。　Some　Frenchmen；　Rousseau　for　instance；　are
not；　however；　to　be　included　with　the　rest；　one　of　this　author's　works；　“The　Confession　of　Faith　of
a　Vicar；”　（1）　contains　the　very　same　theism　which　is　found　in　German　theologians。　Thus　French
metaphysics　finds　a　parallel　not　only　in　Spinoza　（supra；　p。　382）　but　also　in　the　German
metaphysics　of　Wolff。　Other　Frenchmen　have　confessedly　gone　over　to　naturalism；　among　them　is
specially　to　be　mentioned　Mirabaud；　to　whom　the　Système　de　la　Nature　is　attributed。

In　what　has　been　termed　French　philosophy；　represented　by　Voltaire；　Montesquieu；　Rousseau；
d'Alembert；　Diderot；　and　in　what　subsequently　appeared　in　Germany　as　the　Aufkl？rung；　and　has
been　also　stigmatized　as　atheism；　we　may　now　distinguish　three　aspects；　first；　the　negative　side；　to
which　most　exception　has　been　taken；　secondly；　the　positive　side；　thirdly；　the　philosophical；
metaphysical　side。



　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　1。　THE　NEGATIVE　ASPECT。

Justice　must　be　done　even　to　this　negative　side；　as　to　everything　else；　what　is　substantial　in　it　is　the
attack　of　the　reasoning　instinct　against　a　condition　of　degeneracy；　I　may　even　say　of　utter　and
universal　falsehood；　for　instance；　against　the　positive　side　of　a　religion　that　has　become　wooden
and　lifeless。　What　we　call　religion　is　firm　faith；　conviction　that　there　is　a　God；　if　this　is　faith　in　the
doctrines　of　Christianity；　it　is　more　or　less　abstracted　from。　But　in　this　attack　against　religion　we
have　to　think　of　something　quite　different　from　the　above；　in　what　we　find　here；　the　positive　of
religion　is　the　negative　of　reason。　If　we　would　understand　the　feeling　of　indignation　to　which　these
writers　give　utterance；　we　must　keep　before　our　eyes　the　state　of　religion　in　those　days；　with　its
might　and　magnificence；　the　corruption　of　its　manners；　its　avarice；　its　ambition；　its　luxury；　for　which
nevertheless　reverence　was　claimed　—　a　state　of　contradiction　present　and　existent。　We　perceive
into　what　a　frightful　condition　of　formalism　and　deadness　positive　religion　had　sunk；　as　had　the
bonds　of　society　as　well；　the　means　employed　for　the　administration　of　justice；　the　power　of　the
state。　This　French　philosophy　also　attacked　the　state；　it　assailed　prejudices　and　superstition；
especially　the　depravity　of　civic　life；　of　court　manners　and　of　Government　officials；　it　laid　hold　of
and　brought　to　light　the　evil；　the　ridiculous；　the　base；　and　exposed　the　whole　tissue　of　hypocrisy
and　unjust　power　to　the　derision；　the　contempt　and　the　hatred　of　the　world　at　large；　and　thus
brought　men's　minds　and　hearts　into　a　state　of　indifference　to　the　idols　of　the　world　and　indignation
against　them。　Old　institutions；　which　in　the　sense　of　self…conscious　freedom　and　humanity　that　had
developed；　no　longer　found　a　place；　and　which　had　formerly　been　founded　and　upheld　by　mutual
good　feeling　and　the　obtuseness　of　a　consciousness　unconscious　of　self；　institutions　which　were　no
longer　in　harmony　with　the　spirit　that　had　established　them；　and　now；　in　consequence　of　the
advance　that　had　been　made　in　scientific　culture；　were　bound　to　make　good　to　reason　their　claim
to　be　sacred　and　just；　—　this　was　the　formalism　that　those　philosophers　overthrew。　In　making　their
attacks；　they　wrote　sometimes　with　reasoned　argument；　sometimes　satirically；　sometimes　in　the
language　of　plain　common…sense；　and　they　did　not　wage　war　on　what　we　call　religion；　that；　was
left　quite　unharmed；　and　its　claims　were　urged　with　words　of　choicest　eloquence。　Those　who
enforced　these　views　were　therefore　agents　of　destruction　against　that　alone　which　was　in　itself
already　destroyed。　We　place　it　to　our　credit　when　we　reproach　the　French　for　their　attacks　upon
religion　and　on　the　state。　We　must　represent　to　ourselves　the　horrible　state　of　society；　the　misery
and　degradation　in　France；　in　order　to　appreciate　the　services　that　these　writers　rendered。
Hypocrisy　and　cant；　imbecility　of　mind　and　the　tyranny　which　sees　itself　robbed　of　its　prey；　may
say　that　attacks　were　made　on　religion；　on　the　state；　and　on　manners。　But　what　a　religion！　Not　the
religion　that　Luther　purified；　but　the　most　wretched　superstition；　priestly　domination；　stupidity；
degradation　of　mind；　and　more　especially　the　squandering　of　riches　and　the　revelling　in　temporal
possessions　in　the　midst　of　public　misery。　And　what　a　state！　The　blindest　tyranny　of　ministers　and
their　mistresses；　wives　and　chamberlains　so　that　a　vast　army　of　petty　tyrants　and　idlers　looked
upon　it　as　a　right　divinely　given　them　to　plunder　the　revenues　of　the　state　and　lay　hands　upon　the
product　of　the　nation's　sweat。　The　shamelessness；　the　dishonesty　were　past　belief；　and　morals
were　simply　in　keeping　with　the　corruptness　of　the　institutions。　We　see　the　law　defied　by
individuals　in　respect　to　civil　and　political　life；　we　see　it　likewise　set　at　nought　in　respect　to
conscience　and　thought。

In　regard　to　practical　politics；　the　writers　in　question　never　even　thought　of　a　revolution；　but
desired　and　demanded　reforms　alone；　and　that　these　should　be　subjective　mainly；　they　called　on
the　Government　to　sweep　away　abuses；　and　appoint　honourable　men　as　ministers。　The　positive
recommendations　made　by　them　as　to　the　course　to　be　pursued　were；　for　example；　that　the　royal
children　should　receive　a　good　upbringing；　that　princes　should　be　of　frugal　habits；　&c。　The　French
Revolution　was　forced　on　by　the　stiff…necked　obstinacy　of　prejudices；　by　haughtiness；　utter　want
of　thought；　and　avarice。　The　philosophers　of　whom　we　are　speaking　were　able　to　give　only　a
general　idea　of　what　ought　to　be　done；　they　could　not　indicate　the　mode　in　which　the　reforms　were
to　be　carried　out。　It　was　the　Government's　business　to　make　arrangements　and　carry　out　reforms
in　concrete　shape；　but　it　did　not　perceive　this。　What　the　philosophers　brought　forward　and
maintained　as　a　remedy　for　this　horrible　state　of　disorder　was；　speaking　generally；　that　men　should
no　longer　be　in　the　position　of　laymen；　either　with　regard　to　religion　or　to　law；　so　that　in　religious
matters　there　should　not　be　a　hierarchy；　a　limited　and　selected　number　of　priests；　and　in　the　same
way　that　there　should　not　be　in　legal　matters　an　exclusive　caste　and　society　（not　even　a　class　of
professional　lawyers）；　in　whom　should　reside；　and　to　whom　should　be　restricted；　the　knowledge　of
what　is　eternal；　divine；　true；　and　right；　and　by　whom　other　men　should　be　commanded　and
directed；　but　that　human　reason　should　have　the　right　of　giving　its　assent　and　its　opinion。　To　treat
barbarians　as　laymen　is　quite　as　it　should　be　—　barbarians　are　nothing　but　laymen；　but　to　treat
thinking　men　as　laymen　is　very　hard。　This　great　claim　made　by　man　to　subjective　freedom；
perception　and　conviction；　the　philosophers　in　question　contended　for　heroically　and　with　splendid
genius；　with　warmth　and　fire；　with　spirit　and　courage；　maintaining　that　a　man's　own　self；　the　human
spirit；　is　the　source　from　which　is　derived　all　that　is　to　be　respected　by　him。　There　thus　manifests
itself　in　them　the　fanaticism　of　abstract　thought。　We　Germans　were　passive　at　first　with　regard　to
the　existing　state　of　affairs；　we　endured　it；　in　the　second　place；　when　that　state　of　affairs　was
overthrown；　we　were　just　as　passive：　it　was　overthrown　by　the　efforts　of　others；　we　let　it　be　taken
away　from　us；　we　suffered　it　all　to　happen。

In　Germany；　Frederick　II。　allied　himself　with　this　culture；　a　rare　example　in　those　days。　French
court　manners；　operas；　gardens；　dresses；　were　widely　adopted　in　Germany；　but　not　French
philosophy；　yet　in　the　form　of　wit　and　jest　much　of　it　found　its　way　into　this　upper　world；　and　much
that　was　evil　and　barbarous　was　driven　away。　Frederick　II。；　without　having　been　brought　up　on
melancholy　psalms；　without　having　had　to　learn　one　or　two　of　them　every　day　by　heart；　without　the
barbarous　metaphysics　and　logic　of　Wolff　（for　what　did　he　find　to　admire　in　Germany　except
Gellert？）；　was　well　acquainted　with　the　great；　although　formal　and　abstract　principles　of　religion
and　the　state；　and　governed　in　accordance　therewith；　as　far　as　circumstances　allowed。　Nothing
else　was　at　that　time　required　in　his　nation；　one　cannot　ask　that　he　should　have　reformed　and
revolutionised　it；　since　not　a　single　person　yet　demanded　representative　government　and　the
publicity　of　courts　of　justice。　He　introduced　what　there　was　need　of；　religious　tolerance；　legislation；
improvements　in　the　administration　of　justice；　economy　in　the　revenues　of　state；　of　the　wretched
German　law　there　remained　no　longer　in　his　states　even　the　merest　phantom。　He　showed　what　was
the　object　and　purpose　of　the　state；　and　at　the　same　time　cast　down　all　privileges；　the　private　rights
which　pertained　to　Germans；　and　arbitrary　statute　laws。　It　is　foolish　when　cant　and　German
pseudo…patriotism　pounce　down　upon　him　now；　and　try　to　disparage　the　greatness　of　a　man
whose　influence　was　so　enormous；　and　would　even　detract　from　his　fame　by　a　charge　of　vanity
and　wickedness。　What　German　patriotism　aims　at　should　be　reasonable。



　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　2。　THE　POSITIVE　ASPECT。

The　affirmative　content　of　this　philosophy　certainly　does　not　satisfy　the　requirements　of　profundity。
A　leading　characteristic　of　its　teaching；　which　is　found　also　with　the　Scottish　philosophers　and　with
ourselves；　is　the　assumption　of　primitive　feelings　of　justice　which　man　has　in　himself；　as　for　example
benevolence　and　social　instincts　which　should　be　cultivated。　The　positive　source　of　knowledge　and
of　justice　is　plac