the hunchback of notre dame-第22部分
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
d remember that it was the color with which the hangman smeared 〃accursed〃 edifices； he would recall the H？tel du Petit…Bourbon； all smeared thus； on account of the constable's treason。 〃Yellow； after all； of so good a quality；〃 said Sauval； 〃and so well recommended； that more than a century has not yet caused it to lose its color。〃 He would think that the sacred place had become infamous； and would flee。
And if we ascend the cathedral； without mentioning a thousand barbarisms of every sort；what has become of that charming little bell tower； which rested upon the point of intersection of the cross…roofs； and which； no less frail and no less bold than its neighbor （also destroyed）； the spire of the Sainte…Chapelle； buried itself in the sky； farther forward than the towers； slender； pointed； sonorous； carved in open work。 An architect of good taste amputated it （1787）； and considered it sufficient to mask the wound with that large； leaden plaster； which resembles a pot cover。
'Tis thus that the marvellous art of the Middle Ages has been treated in nearly every country； especially in France。 One can distinguish on its ruins three sorts of lesions； all three of which cut into it at different depths； first； time； which has insensibly notched its surface here and there； and gnawed it everywhere； next； political and religious revolution； which； blind and wrathful by nature； have flung themselves tumultuously upon it； torn its rich garment of carving and sculpture； burst its rose windows； broken its necklace of arabesques and tiny figures； torn out its statues； sometimes because of their mitres； sometimes because of their crowns； lastly； fashions； even more grotesque and foolish； which； since the anarchical and splendid deviations of the Renaissance； have followed each other in the necessary decadence of architecture。 Fashions have wrought more harm than revolutions。 They have cut to the quick； they have attacked the very bone and framework of art； they have cut； slashed； disorganized； killed the edifice； in form as in the symbol； in its consistency as well as in its beauty。 And then they have made it over； a presumption of which neither time nor revolutions at least have been guilty。 They have audaciously adjusted； in the name of 〃good taste；〃 upon the wounds of gothic architecture； their miserable gewgaws of a day； their ribbons of marble； their pompons of metal； a veritable leprosy of egg…shaped ornaments； volutes； whorls； draperies； garlands； fringes； stone flames； bronze clouds； pudgy cupids； chubby… cheeked cherubim； which begin to devour the face of art in the oratory of Catherine de Medicis； and cause it to expire； two centuries later； tortured and grimacing； in the boudoir of the Dubarry。
Thus； to sum up the points which we have just indicated； three sorts of ravages to…day disfigure Gothic architecture。 Wrinkles and warts on the epidermis； this is the work of time。 Deeds of violence； brutalities； contusions； fractures； this is the work of the revolutions from Luther to Mirabeau。 Mutilations； amputations； dislocation of the joints； 〃restorations〃； this is the Greek； Roman； and barbarian work of professors according to Vitruvius and Vignole。 This magnificent art produced by the Vandals has been slain by the academies。 The centuries； the revolutions； which at least devastate with impartiality and grandeur； have been joined by a cloud of school architects； licensed； sworn； and bound by oath； defacing with the discernment and choice of bad taste； substituting the ~chicorées~ of Louis XV。 for the Gothic lace； for the greater glory of the Parthenon。 It is the kick of the ass at the dying lion。 It is the old oak crowning itself； and which； to heap the measure full； is stung； bitten； and gnawed by caterpillars。
How far it is from the epoch when Robert Cenalis； comparing Notre…Dame de Paris to the famous temple of Diana at Ephesus； *so much lauded by the ancient pagans*； which Erostatus *has* immortalized； found the Gallic temple 〃more excellent in length； breadth； height； and structure。〃*
* _Histoire Gallicane_； liv。 II。 Periode III。 fo。 130； p。 1。
Notre…Dame is not； moreover； what can be called a complete； definite； classified monument。 It is no longer a Romanesque church； nor is it a Gothic church。 This edifice is not a type。 Notre…Dame de Paris has not； like the Abbey of Tournus； the grave and massive frame； the large and round vault； the glacial bareness； the majestic simplicity of the edifices which have the rounded arch for their progenitor。 It is not； like the Cathedral of Bourges； the magnificent； light； multiform； tufted； bristling efflorescent product of the pointed arch。 Impossible to class it in that ancient family of sombre； mysterious churches； low and crushed as it were by the round arch； almost Egyptian； with the exception of the ceiling； all hieroglyphics； all sacerdotal； all symbolical； more loaded in their ornaments； with lozenges and zigzags； than with flowers； with flowers than with animals； with animals than with men； the work of the architect less than of the bishop； first transformation of art； all impressed with theocratic and military discipline； taking root in the Lower Empire； and stopping with the time of William the Conqueror。 Impossible to place our Cathedral in that other family of lofty； aerial churches； rich in painted windows and sculpture； pointed in form； bold in attitude； communal and bourgeois as political symbols； free； capricious； lawless； as a work of art； second transformation of architecture； no longer hieroglyphic； immovable and sacerdotal； but artistic； progressive； and popular； which begins at the return from the crusades； and ends with Louis IX。 Notre…Dame de Paris is not of pure Romanesque； like the first； nor of pure Arabian race； like the second。
It is an edifice of the transition period。 The Saxon architect completed the erection of the first pillars of the nave； when the pointed arch； which dates from the Crusade； arrived and placed itself as a conqueror upon the large Romanesque capitals which should support only round arches。 The pointed arch； mistress since that time； constructed the rest of the church。 Nevertheless； timid and inexperienced at the start； it sweeps out； grows larger； restrains itself； and dares no longer dart upwards in spires and lancet windows； as it did later on； in so many marvellous cathedrals。 One would say that it were conscious of the vicinity of the heavy Romanesque pillars。
However； these edifices of the transition from the Romanesque to the Gothic； are no less precious for study than the pure types。 They express a shade of the art which would be lost without them。 It is the graft of the pointed upon the round arch。
Notre…Dame de Paris is； in particular； a curious specimen of this variety。 Each face； each stone of the venerable monument； is a page not only of the history of the country； but of the history of science and art as well。 Thus； in order to indicate here only the principal details； while the little Red Door almost attains to the limits of the Gothic delicacy of the fifteenth century； the pillars of the nave； by their size and weight； go back to the Carlovingian Abbey of Saint…Germain des Prés。 One would suppose that six centuries separated these pillars from that door。 There is no one； not even the hermetics； who does not find in the symbols of the grand portal a satisfactory compendium of their science； of which the Church of Saint…Jacques de la Boucherie was so complete a hieroglyph。 Thus； the Roman abbey； the philosophers' church； the Gothic art； Saxon art； the heavy； round pillar； which recalls Gregory VII。； the hermetic symbolism； with which Nicolas Flamel played the prelude to Luther； papal unity； schism； Saint…Germain des Prés； Saint…Jacques de la Boucherie；all are mingled； combined； amalgamated in Notre…Dame。 This central mother church is； among the ancient churches of Paris； a sort of chimera； it has the head of one； the limbs of another； the haunches of another； something of all。
We repeat it； these hybrid constructions are not the least interesting for the artist； for the antiquarian； for the historian。 They make one feel to what a degree architecture is a primitive thing； by demonstrating （what is also demonstrated by the cyclopean vestiges； the pyramids of Egypt； the gigantic Hindoo pagodas） that the greatest products of architecture are less the works of individuals than of society； rather the offspring of a nation's effort； than the inspired flash of a man of genius； the deposit left by a whole people； the heaps accumulated by centuries； the residue of successive evaporations of human society；in a word； species of formations。 Each wave of time contributes its alluvium； each race deposits its layer on the monument； each individual brings his stone。 Thus do the beavers； thus do the bees； thus do men。 The great symbol of architecture； Babel； is a hive。
Great edifices； like great mountains； are the work of centuries。 Art often undergoes a transformation while they are pending； ~pendent opera interrupta~； they proceed quietly in accordance with the transformed art。 The new art takes the monument where it finds it； incrusts itself there； assimilates it to itself； develops it according to its fancy； and finishes it if it can。 The thing is accomplished without trouble； without effort； without reaction；following a natural and tranquil law。 It is a graft which shoots up； a sap which circulates； a vegetation which starts forth anew。 Certainly there is matter here for many large volumes； and often the universal history of humanity in the successive engrafting of many arts at many levels； upon the same monument。 The man； the artist； the individual； is effaced in these great masses； which lack the name of their author； human intelligence is there summed up and totalized。 Time is the architect； the nation is the builder。
Not to consider here anything except the Christian architecture of Europe； that younger sister of the great masonries of the Orient； it appears to the eyes as an immense formation divided into three well…defined zones； which are superposed； the one upon the other： the Romanesque zone*； the Gothic zone； the zone of the Renaissance； which we would gladly call the Gre
