list2-第16部分
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
therefore a blessing to a nation; just as the War of Independence
of the United States of North America; in spite of the enormous
sacrifices which it required; has become a blessing to all future
generations。 But a peace which throws back into a purely
agricultural condition a nation which is fitted to develop a
manufacturing power of its own; becomes a curse to it; and is
incomparably more injurious to it than a war。
It is fortunate for the manufacturing powers of the second and
third rank; that England after the restoration of the general peace
has herself imposed a limit to her main tendency (of monopolising
the manufacturing market of the whole earth); by imposing
restrictions on the importation of foreign means of subsistence and
raw materials。 Certainly the English agriculturists; who had
enjoyed a monopoly of supplying the English market with products
during the war; would of course have painfully felt the foreign
competition; but that only at first; at a later period (as we will
show more particularly elsewhere); these losses would have been
made up to them tenfold by the fact that England had obtained a
monopoly of manufacturing for the whole world。 But it would have
been still more injudicious if the manufacturing nations of the
second and third rank; after their own manufacturing power had just
been called into existence; in consequence of wars lasting for
twenty…five years; and after (in consequence of twenty…five years'
exclusion of their agricultural products from the English market)
that power has been strengthened so far that possibly it only
required another ten or fifteen years of strict protection in order
to sustain successfully free competition with English manufactures
if (we say) these nations; after having endured the sacrifices
of half a century; were to give up the immense advantages of
possessing a manufacturing power of their own; and were to descend
once more from the high state of culture; prosperity; and
independence; which is peculiar to agricultural…manufacturing
countries; to the low position of dependent agricultural nations;
merely because it now pleases the English nation to perceive its
error and the closely impending advances of the Continental nations
which enter into competition with it。
Supposing also that the manufacturing interest of England
should obtain sufficient influence to force the House of Lords;
which chiefly consists of large landed proprietors; and the House
of Commons; composed mostly of country squires; to make concessions
in respect of the importation of agricultural products; who would
guarantee that after a lapse of a few years a new Tory ministry
would not under different circumstances again pass a new Corn Law?
Who can guarantee that a new naval war or a new Continental system
may not separate the agriculturists of the Continent from the
manufacturers of the island kingdom; and compel the Continental
nations to recommence their manufacturing career; and to spend
their best energies in overcoming its primary difficulties; merely
in order; at a later period to sacrifice everything again at the
conclusion of peace。
In this manner the school would condemn the Continental nations
for ever to be rolling the stone of Sisyphus; for ever to erect
manufactories in time of war in order to allow them to fall to ruin
in time of peace。
To results so absurd as these the school could never have
arrived had it not (in spite of the name which it gives to the
science which it professes) completely excluded politics from that
science; had it not completely ignored the very existence of
nationality; and left entirely out of consideration the effects of
war on the commercial intercourse between separate nations。
How utterly different is the relation of the agriculturist to
the manufacturer if both live in one and the same country; and are
consequently really connected with one another by perpetual peace。
Under those circumstances; every extension or improvement of an
already existing manufactory increases the demand for agricultural
products。 This demand is no uncertain one; it is not dependent on
foreign commercial regulations or foreign commercial fluctuations;
on foreign political commotions or wars; on foreign inventions and
improvements; or on foreign harvests; the native agriculturist has
not to share it with other nations; it is certain to him every
year。 However the crops of other nations may turn out; whatever
misunderstandings may spring up in the political world; he can
depend on the sale of his own produce; and on obtaining the
manufactured goods which he needs at suitable and regular prices。
On the other hand; every improvement of the native agriculture;
every new method of culture; acts as a stimulant on the native
manufacture; because every augmentation of native agricultural
production must result in a proportionate augmentation of native
manufacturing production。 Thus; by means of this reciprocal action;
progress is insured for all time to both these main sources of the
nation's strength and support。
Political power not merely secures to the nation the increase
of its prosperity by foreign commerce and by colonies abroad; it
also secures to it the possession of internal prosperity; and
secures to it its own existence; which is far more important to it
than mere material wealth。 England has obtained political power by
means of her navigation laws; and by means of political power she
has been placed in a position to extend her manufacturing power
over other nations。 Poland; however; was struck out of the list of
nations because she did not possess a vigorous middle class; which
could only have been called into existence by the establishment of
an internal manufacturing power。
The school cannot deny that the internal market of a nation is
ten times more important to it than its external one; even where
the latter is in the most flourishing condition; but it has omitted
to draw from this the conclusion; which is very obvious; that it is
ten times more important to cultivate and secure the home market;
than to seek for wealth abroad; and that only in those nations
which have developed their internal industry to a high degree can
foreign commerce attain importance。
The school has formed its estimate of the nature and character
of the market only from a cosmopolitical; but not from a political
point of view。 Most of the maritime countries of the European
continent are situated in the natural market district of the
manufacturers of London; Liverpool; or Manchester; only very few of
the inland manufacturers of other nations can; under free trade;
maintain in their own seaports the same prices as the English
manufacturers。 The possession of larger capital; a larger home
market of their own; which enables them to manufacture on a larger
scale and consequently more cheaply; greater progress in
manufacture itself; and finally cheaper sea transport; give at the
present time to the English manufacturers advantages over the
manufacturers of other countries; which can only be gradually
diverted to the native industry of the latter by means of long and
continuous protection of their home market; and through perfection
of their inland means of transport。 The market of the inhabitants
of its coasts is; however; of great importance to every nation;
both with reference to the home market; and to foreign commerce;
and a nation the market of whose coasts belongs more to the
foreigner than to itself; is a divided nation not merely in
economical respects; but also in political ones。 Indeed; there can
be no more injurious position for a nation; whether in its
economical or political aspect; than if its seaports sympathise
more with the foreigner than with itself。
Science must not deny the nature of special national
circumstances; nor ignore and misrepresent it; in order to promote
cosmopolitical objects。 Those objects can only be attained by
paying regard to nature; and by trying to lead the Separate nations
in accordance with it to a higher aim。 We may see what small
success has hitherto attended the doctrines of the school in
practice。 This is not so much the fault of practical statesmen; by
whom the character of the national circumstances has been
comprehended tolerably correctly; as the fault of the theories
themselves; the practice of which (inasmuch as they are opposed to
all experience) must necessarily err。 Have those theories prevented
nations (like those of South America) from introducing the
protectionist system; which is contrary to the requirements of
their national circumstances? Or have they prevented the extension
of protectionism to the production of provisions and raw materials;
which; however; needs no protection; and in which the restriction
of commercial intercourse must be disadvantageous under all
circumstances to both nations to that which imposes; as well as
to that which suffers from such restrictions? Has this theory
prevented the finer manufactured goods; which are essentially
articles of luxury; from being comprehended among objects requiring
protection; while it is nevertheless clear that these can be
exposed to competition without the least danger to the prosperity
of the nation? No; the theory has till now not effected any