list2-第39部分
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
A nation obtains the power of disposition of the amount of
ready money which is always required for its internal trade; mainly
through the possession or the production of those goods and values
whose facility of exchange approaches most nearly to that of the
precious metals。
The diversity of this property of the facility of exchange in
respect to the various articles of commerce and of property; has
been as little taken into consideration by the popular school of
economists in judging of international commerce; as the power of
disposition of the precious metals。 If we consider in this respect
the various articles of value existing in private interchange; we
perceive that many of them are fixed in such a way that their value
is exchangeable only on the spot where they are; and that even
there their exchange is attended with great costs and difficulties。
To that class belong more than three…fourths of all national
property…namely; immovable properties and fixed plant and
instruments。 However large the landed property of an individual may
be; he cannot send his fields and meadows to town in order to
obtain money or goods for them。 He can; indeed; raise mortgages on
such property; but he must first find a lender on them; and the
further from his estate that such an individual resides; the
smaller will be the probability of the borrower's requirements
being satisfied。
Next after property thus fixed to the locality; the greatest
part of agricultural products (excepting colonial produce and a few
less valuable articles) have in regard to international intercourse
the least facility for exchange。 The greatest part of these values;
as e。g。 building materials and wood for fuel; bread stuffs; &c。;
fruit; and cattle; can only be sold within a reasonable distance of
the place where they are produced; and if a great surplus of them
exists they have to be warehoused in order to become realisable。 So
far as such products can be exported to foreign countries their
sale again is limited to certain manufacturing and commercial
nations; and in these also their sale is generally limited by
duties on importation and is affected by the larger or smaller
produce of the purchasing nation's own harvests。 The inland
territories of North America might be completely overstocked with
cattle and products; but it would not be possible for them to
procure through exportation of this excess considerable amounts of
the precious metals from South America; from England; or from the
European continent。 The valuable manufactured goods of common use;
on the other hand; possess incomparably greater facilities for
exchange。 They find at ordinary times a sale in all open markets of
the world; and at extraordinary crises they also find a sale (at
lower prices) in those markets whose protective tariffs are
calculated to operate adversely merely in ordinary times。 The power
of exchange of these articles clearly approaches most nearly to
that of the precious metals; and the experience of England shows
that if in consequence of deficient harvests money crises occur;
the increased exportation of fabrics; and of foreign stocks and
State paper; quickly rectifies the balance。 The latter; the foreign
stocks and State paper; which are evidently the results of former
favourable balances of exchange caused by exportations of fabrics;
constitute in the hands of the nation which is rich in
manufacturing industry so many bills which can be drawn on the
agricultural nation; which at the time of an extraordinary demand
for the precious metals are indeed drawn with loss to the
individual owner of them (like the manufactured goods at the time
of money crises); but; nevertheless; with immense advantage to the
maintenance of the economical conditions of that nation which is
rich in manufacturing industry。
However much the doctrine of the balance of trade may have been
scorned by the popular school; observations like those above
described encourage us nevertheless to express the opinion that
between large and independent nations something of the nature of a
balance of trade must exist; that it is dangerous for great nations
to remain for a long period at very considerable disadvantage in
respect of this balance; and that a considerable and lasting efflux
of the precious metals must always be followed as a consequence by
important revolutions in the system of credit and in the condition
of prices in the interior of the nation。 We are far from wishing in
these remarks to revive the doctrine of the balance of trade as it
existed under the so…called 'mercantile system;' and to maintain
that the nation ought to impose obstacles in the way of the
exportation of precious metals; or that we must keep a specially
exact account with each individual nation; or that in the commerce
between great nations a few millions difference between the imports
and exports is of great moment。 What we deny is merely this: that
a great and independent nation; as Adam Smith maintains at the
conclusion of his chapter devoted to this subject;(1*) 'may
continually import every year considerably larger values in
products and fabrics than it exports; that the quantities of
precious metals existing in such a nation may decrease considerably
from year to year and be replaced by paper circulation in the
interior; moreover; that such a nation may allow its indebtedness
towards another nation continually to increase and expand; and at
the same time nevertheless make progress from year to year in
prosperity。
This opinion; expressed by Adam Smith and maintained since that
time by his school; is alone that which we here characterise as one
that has been contradicted a hundred times by experience; as one
that is contrary in the very nature of things to common sense; in
one word (to retort upon Adam Smith his own energetic expression)
as 'an absurdity。'
It must be well understood that we are not speaking here of
countries which carry on the production of the precious metals
themselves at a profit; from which therefore the export of these
articles has quite the character of an export of manufactured
goods。 We are also not speaking of that difference in the balance
of trade which must necessarily arise if the nation rates its
exports and imports at those prices which they have in their own
seaport towns。 That in such a case the amount of imports of every
nation must exceed its exports by the total amount of the nation's
own commercial profits (a circumstance which speaks to its
advantage rather than to its disadvantage); is clear and
indisputable。 Still less do we mean to deny the extraordinary cases
where the greater exportation rather denotes loss of value than
gain; as e。g。 if property is lost by shipwreck。 The popular school
has made clever use of all those delusions arising from a
shopkeeper…like calculation and comparison of the value of the
exchanges arising from the exports and imports; in order to make us
disbelieve in the disadvantages which result from a real and
enormous disproportion between the exports and imports of any great
and independent nation; even though such disproportion be not
permanent; which shows itself in such immense sums as for instance
in the case of France in 1786 and 1789; in that of Russia in 1820
and 1821; and in that of the United States of North America after
the 'Compromise Bill。'
Finally; we desire to speak (and this must be specially noted)
not of colonies; not of dependent countries; not of small states or
of single independent towns; but of entire; great; independent
nations; which possess a commercial system of their own; a national
system of agriculture and industry; a national system of money and
credit。
It evidently consists with the character of colonies that their
exports can surpass their imports considerably and continuously;
without thereby involving any conclusion as to the decrease or
increase of their prosperity。 The colony always prospers in the
proportion in which the total amount of its exports and imports
increases year by year。 If its export of colonial produce exceeds
its imports of manufactured goods considerably and lastingly the
main cause of this may be that the landed proprietors of the colony
live in the mother country; and that they receive their income in
the shape of colonial goods; in produce; or in the money which has
been obtained for them。 If; however; the exports of fabrics to the
colony exceed the imports of colonial goods considerably; this may
be chiefly due to the fact that by emigrations or loans from year
to year large masses of capital go to the colony。 This latter
circumstance is; of course; of the utmost advantage to the
prosperity of the colony。 It can continue for centuries and yet
commercial crises under such circumstances may be infrequent or
impossible; because the colony is endangered neither by wars nor by
hostile commercial measures; nor by operations of the national bank
of the mother country; because it possesses no independent system
of commerce; credit; and industry peculiar to itself; but is; on
the contrary; supported and constantly upheld by the institutions
of credit and political measures of the mother country。
Such a condition existed for more than a century with advantage
between North America