°Ëϲµç×ÓÊé > ¾­¹ÜÆäËûµç×ÓÊé > 30+mba >

µÚ47²¿·Ö

30+mba-µÚ47²¿·Ö

С˵£º 30+mba ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



have¡¡an¡¡effect¡£¡¡Figure¡¡7¡£1¡¡is¡¡that¡¡of¡¡a¡¡theoretical¡¡demand¡¡curve¡£¡¡
The¡¡figure¡¡shows¡¡how¡¡the¡¡volume¡¡of¡¡sales¡¡of¡¡a¡¡particular¡¡good¡¡or¡¡service¡¡
will¡¡change¡¡with¡¡changes¡¡in¡¡price¡£¡¡The¡¡elasticity¡¡of¡¡demand¡¡is¡¡a¡¡measure¡¡
of¡¡the¡¡degree¡¡to¡¡which¡¡consumers¡¡are¡¡sensitive¡¡to¡¡price¡£¡¡This¡¡is¡¡calculated¡¡
by¡¡dividing¡¡the¡¡percentage¡¡change¡¡in¡¡demand¡¡by¡¡the¡¡percentage¡¡change¡¡
in¡¡price¡£¡¡If¡¡a¡¡price¡¡is¡¡reduced¡¡by¡¡50¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡£¨eg¡¡from¡¡¡ê100¡¡to¡¡¡ê50£©¡¡and¡¡the¡¡
quantity¡¡demanded¡¡increased¡¡by¡¡100¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡£¨eg¡¡from¡¡1£»000¡¡to¡¡2£»000£©£»¡¡the¡¡
elasticity¡¡of¡¡demand¡¡coefficient¡¡is¡¡2¡¡£¨100/50£©¡£¡¡Here¡¡the¡¡quantity¡¡demanded¡¡
changes¡¡by¡¡a¡¡bigger¡¡percentage¡¡than¡¡the¡¡price¡¡change£»¡¡so¡¡demand¡¡is¡¡
considered¡¡to¡¡be¡¡elastic¡£¡¡Were¡¡the¡¡demand¡¡in¡¡this¡¡case¡¡to¡¡rise¡¡by¡¡only¡¡25¡¡
per¡¡cent£»¡¡then¡¡the¡¡elasticity¡¡of¡¡demand¡¡coefficient¡¡would¡¡be¡¡0¡£5¡¡£¨25/100£©¡£¡¡
Here¡¡the¡¡demand¡¡is¡¡described¡¡as¡¡being¡¡¡®inelastic¡¯¡¡as¡¡the¡¡percentage¡¡demand¡¡
change¡¡is¡¡a¡¡smaller¡¡than¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡price¡¡change¡£¡¡
Having¡¡a¡¡feel¡¡for¡¡elasticity¡¡is¡¡important¡¡in¡¡developing¡¡a¡¡business¡¯s¡¡
marketing¡¡strategy£»¡¡but¡¡there¡¡is¡¡no¡¡perfect¡¡scientific¡¡way¡¡to¡¡work¡¡out¡¡what¡¡
the¡¡demand¡¡coefficient¡¡is£»¡¡it¡¡has¡¡to¡¡be¡¡assessed¡¡by¡¡¡®feel¡¯¡£¡¡Unfortunately£»¡¡the¡¡
price¡¡elasticity¡¡changes¡¡at¡¡different¡¡price¡¡levels¡£¡¡For¡¡example£»¡¡reducing¡¡the¡¡
price¡¡of¡¡vodka¡¡from¡¡¡ê10¡¡to¡¡¡ê5¡¡might¡¡double¡¡sales£»¡¡but¡¡halving¡¡it¡¡again¡¡may¡¡
not¡¡have¡¡such¡¡a¡¡dramatic¡¡effect¡£¡¡In¡¡fact¡¡it¡¡could¡¡encourage¡¡one¡¡group¡¡of¡¡
buyers£»¡¡those¡¡giving¡¡it¡¡as¡¡a¡¡present£»¡¡to¡¡feel¡¡that¡¡giving¡¡something¡¡that¡¡cheap¡¡
is¡¡rather¡¡insulting¡£¡¡
MARKET¡¡STRUCTURES¡¡
The¡¡whole¡¡of¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡economics¡¡as¡¡practised¡¡in¡¡advanced¡¡economies¡¡
is¡¡predicated¡¡on¡¡the¡¡belief¡¡that¡¡market¡¡forces¡¡are¡¡allowed¡¡a¡¡large¡¡degree¡¡of¡¡
High¡¡
High¡¡
Low¡¡
Price¡¡
Volume¡¡
Figure¡¡7¡£1¡¡The¡¡demand¡¡curve
198¡¡The¡¡Thirty¡­Day¡¡MBA¡¡
freedom¡£¡¡New¡¡firms¡¡can¡¡set¡¡up¡¡in¡¡business£»¡¡charging¡¡the¡¡price¡¡they¡¡see¡¡fit£»¡¡
and¡¡if¡¡their¡¡strategy¡¡is¡¡flawed¡¡they¡¡will¡¡be¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡fail¡¡£¨see¡¡also¡¡Chapter¡¡
8£»¡¡Entrepreneurship£©¡£¡¡Price¡¡is¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡send¡¡important¡¡signals¡¡throughout¡¡
the¡¡economy£»¡¡apportioning¡¡demand¡¡and¡¡resources¡¡accordingly¡£¡¡But¡¡perfect¡¡
petition£»¡¡where¡¡price¡¡is¡¡allowed¡¡such¡¡freedom£»¡¡is¡¡only¡¡one¡¡of¡¡four¡¡
prevailing¡¡market¡¡structures£»¡¡although¡¡market¡¡economies¡¡are¡¡dominated¡¡
by¡¡near¡­perfect¡¡petition£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡not¡¡maintained¡¡without¡¡a¡¡struggle¡£¡¡
The¡¡following¡¡are¡¡the¡¡four¡¡market¡¡structures¡¡that¡¡are¡¡at¡¡work¡¡in¡¡
economies¡£¡¡
Monopoly¡¡
Monopolies¡¡exist¡¡where¡¡a¡¡single¡¡supplier¡¡dominates¡¡the¡¡market¡¡and¡¡so¡¡
renders¡¡normal¡¡petitive¡¡forces¡¡largely¡¡redundant¡£¡¡Price£»¡¡quality¡¡and¡¡
innovation¡¡are¡¡promised£»¡¡so¡¡deliver¡¡less¡¡value¡¡to¡¡the¡¡end¡¡consumer¡¡
than¡¡they¡¡might¡¡otherwise¡¡expect¡£¡¡Microso¡£¡£¡¡has¡¡a¡¡near¡­monopolistic¡¡grip¡¡
on¡¡the¡¡operating¡¡system¡¡market£»¡¡as¡¡has¡¡Pfizer£»¡¡the¡¡pharmaceutical¡¡giant£»¡¡
through¡¡its¡¡patent¡¡on¡¡the¡¡drug¡¡Viagra£»¡¡and¡¡British¡¡Airports¡¡Authority¡¡
£¨BAA£©£»¡¡which¡¡runs¡¡Heathrow£»¡¡Gatwick¡¡and¡¡Stansted£»¡¡has¡¡a¡¡similar¡¡hold¡¡on¡¡
London¡¡airports¡¯¡¡traffic¡£¡¡
Monopolies¡¡claim¡¡that¡¡without¡¡being¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡dominate¡¡their¡¡market¡¡
it¡¡would¡¡be¡¡impossible¡¡to¡¡get¡¡sufficient¡¡economies¡¡of¡¡scale¡¡to¡¡reinvest¡£¡¡
That¡¡was¡¡the¡¡argument¡¡of¡¡the¡¡early¡¡railway¡¡panies¡¡and¡¡it¡¡was¡¡BAA¡¯s¡¡
argument¡¡in¡¡2008¡¡in¡¡defending¡¡itself¡¡against¡¡the¡¡prospects¡¡of¡¡a¡¡governmentenforced¡¡
break¡­up¡£¡¡
In¡¡countries¡¡where¡¡monopolies¡¡are¡¡seen¡¡as¡¡being¡¡detrimental£»¡¡bodies¡¡exist¡¡
to¡¡regulate¡¡the¡¡market¡¡to¡¡prevent¡¡them¡¡being¡¡too¡¡powerful¡£¡¡The¡¡UK¡¡has¡¡
the¡¡petition¡¡mission¡¡£¨wwwpetition¡­mission¡£uk£©£»¡¡the¡¡
United¡¡States¡¡the¡¡Federal¡¡Trade¡¡mission¡¡£¨¡£¡£c¡£gov£©¡¡and¡¡the¡¡EU¡¡
has¡¡The¡¡European¡¡mission¡¡£¨h¡£¡£p£º//ec¡£europa¡£eu/m/petition/¡¡
index_en¡£html£©£»¡¡all¡¡keeping¡¡monopolies¡¡in¡¡check¡£¡¡A¡¡duopoly¡¡is£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡name¡¡
would¡¡suggest£»¡¡a¡¡particular¡¡form¡¡of¡¡monopoly¡¡with¡¡only¡¡two¡¡firms¡¡in¡¡the¡¡
market¡£¡¡
Oligopoly¡¡
This¡¡is¡¡where¡¡between¡¡3¡¡and¡¡20¡¡large¡¡firms¡¡dominate¡¡a¡¡market£»¡¡or¡¡where¡¡
4¡¡or¡¡5¡¡firms¡¡share¡¡more¡¡than¡¡40¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡market¡£¡¡The¡¡danger¡¡for¡¡
consumers¡¡and¡¡suppliers¡¡alike¡¡is¡¡that¡¡these¡¡dominant¡¡firms¡¡can¡¡control¡¡
the¡¡market£»¡¡to¡¡their¡¡disadvantage¡£¡¡Supermarket¡¡chains¡¡in¡¡the¡¡UK£»¡¡airlines£»¡¡
oil¡¡exploration¡¡and¡¡refining¡¡businesses¡¡the¡¡world¡¡over¡¡operate¡¡as¡¡virtual¡¡
oligopolies¡£¡¡Frequently¡¡the¡¡temptation¡¡to¡¡act¡¡in¡¡a¡¡cartel¡¡to¡¡fix¡¡prices¡¡is¡¡too¡¡
great¡¡to¡¡resist¡£¡¡BA¡¡had¡¡colluded¡¡with¡¡Virgin¡¡Atlantic¡¡on¡¡at¡¡least¡¡six¡¡occasions¡¡
between¡¡August¡¡2004¡¡and¡¡January¡¡2006£»¡¡the¡¡Office¡¡of¡¡Fair¡¡Trading¡¡said¡£
Economics¡¡199¡¡
Between¡¡August¡¡2004¡¡and¡¡January¡¡2006£»¡¡British¡¡Airways¡¡and¡¡Virgin¡¡
Atlantic£»¡¡the¡¡dominant¡¡players¡¡on¡¡the¡¡route¡¡from¡¡London¡¡to¡¡US¡¡cities£»¡¡
colluded¡¡with¡¡each¡¡other¡¡to¡¡fix¡¡the¡¡price¡¡of¡¡fuel¡¡surcharges¡£¡¡During¡¡that¡¡
time£»¡¡surcharges¡¡rose¡¡from¡¡¡ê5¡¡to¡¡¡ê60¡¡per¡¡ticket¡£¡¡British¡¡Airways¡¡had¡¡to¡¡set¡¡
aside¡¡¡ê350¡¡million¡¡to¡¡deal¡¡with¡¡fines¡¡in¡¡the¡¡UK¡¡and¡¡United¡¡States¡£¡¡
Perfect¡¡petition¡¡
This¡¡is¡¡a¡¡utopian¡¡environment¡¡in¡¡which¡¡there¡¡are¡¡many¡¡suppliers¡¡of¡¡identical¡¡
products¡¡or¡¡services£»¡¡with¡¡equal¡¡access¡¡to¡¡all¡¡the¡¡necessary¡¡resources¡¡
such¡¡as¡¡money£»¡¡materials£»¡¡technology¡¡and¡¡people¡£¡¡There¡¡are¡¡no¡¡barriers¡¡to¡¡
entry£»¡¡so¡¡businesses¡¡can¡¡enter¡¡or¡¡leave¡¡the¡¡market¡¡at¡¡will¡¡and¡¡consumers¡¡
have¡¡perfect¡¡information¡¡on¡¡every¡¡aspect¡¡of¡¡the¡¡alternative¡¡goods¡¡on¡¡offer¡£¡¡
petitive¡¡markets¡¡
Sometimes¡¡referred¡¡to¡¡confusingly¡¡as¡¡monopolistic¡¡petition£»¡¡this¡¡rests¡¡
between¡¡oligopoly¡¡and¡¡perfect¡¡petition£»¡¡but¡¡is¡¡closer¡¡to¡¡perfect¡¡petition¡£¡¡
Here¡¡a¡¡large¡¡number¡¡of¡¡relatively¡¡small¡¡petitors£»¡¡each¡¡with¡¡small¡¡
market¡¡shares£»¡¡pete¡¡with¡¡differentiated¡¡products¡¡satisfying¡¡diverse¡¡
consumer¡¡wants¡¡and¡¡needs¡£¡¡
ESSENTIAL¡¡ECONOMICS¡¡
Despite¡¡the¡¡peting¡¡schools¡¡of¡¡thought¡¡on¡¡how¡¡business¡¡and¡¡the¡¡economy¡¡
interact£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡at¡¡least¡¡general¡¡agreement¡¡on¡¡the¡¡most¡¡important¡¡
factors¡£¡¡True£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡much¡¡disagreement¡¡on¡¡how¡¡important¡¡these¡¡factors¡¡
are¡¡and¡¡even¡¡on¡¡how¡¡they¡¡can¡¡be¡¡influenced£»¡¡but¡¡on¡¡the¡¡factors¡¡themselves¡¡
there¡¡is¡¡a¡¡measure¡¡of¡¡agreement¡£¡¡MBAs¡¡will¡¡need¡¡a¡¡grasp¡¡of¡¡these¡¡key¡¡issues¡¡
in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡play¡¡a¡¡full¡¡role¡¡in¡¡shaping¡¡the¡¡strategy¡¡of¡¡their¡¡organization¡£¡¡
Economic¡¡growth¡¡
Government¡¯s¡¡role¡¡in¡¡economic¡¡policy¡¡is¡¡generally¡¡accepted¡¡as¡¡being¡¡to¡¡steer¡¡
a¡¡path¡¡that¡¡ensures¡¡long¡­term¡¡growth¡¡without¡¡leading¡¡to¡¡a¡¡general¡¡rise¡¡in¡¡
prices¡¡£¨see¡¡Inflation£»¡¡below£©¡£¡¡The¡¡underlying¡¡belief¡¡is¡¡that¡¡growth¡¡in¡¡goods¡¡
and¡¡services¡¡leads¡¡to¡¡a¡¡happier£»¡¡more¡¡satisfied¡¡population£»¡¡while¡¡spreading¡¡
democracy£»¡¡diversity£»¡¡social¡¡mobility¡¡and¡¡greater¡¡all¡­round¡¡tolerance¡£¡¡Also£»¡¡
the¡¡bigger¡¡the¡¡gross¡¡domestic¡¡product¡¡£¨GDP£©¡¡the¡¡more¡¡guns¡¡and¡¡bombs¡¡a¡¡
country¡¡can¡¡afford£»¡¡both¡¡to¡¡defend¡¡itself¡¡and¡¡to¡¡impose¡¡its¡¡will¡¡on¡¡others¡¡
who¡¡are¡¡weaker¡£¡¡There¡¡is¡¡certainly¡¡evidence¡¡that¡¡people¡¡judge¡¡their¡¡wellbeing¡¡
by¡¡paring¡¡themselves¡¡to¡¡others£»¡¡but¡¡unfortunately¡¡as¡¡ine¡¡
goes¡¡up£»¡¡so¡¡do¡¡expectations¡£
200¡¡The¡¡Thirty¡­Day¡¡MBA¡¡
There¡¡have¡¡been¡¡many¡¡a¡£¡£empts¡¡at¡¡creating¡¡a¡¡more¡¡prehensive¡¡
measure¡¡of¡¡economic¡¡health¡£¡¡Gross¡¡National¡¡Happiness¡¡£¨grossin¡¡
ternationalhappiness/£©¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Genuine¡¡Progress¡¡Indicator¡¡£¨¡¡
rprogress/sustainability_indicators/genuine_progress_indicator¡£htm£©¡¡
are¡¡a¡£¡£empts¡¡to¡¡include¡¡a¡¡range¡¡of¡¡other¡¡factors¡¡such¡¡as¡¡life¡¡expectancy£»¡¡crime¡¡
rates£»¡¡pollution£»¡¡long¡­term¡¡environmental¡¡damage£»¡¡resource¡¡depletion¡¡and¡¡
ine¡¡distribution£»¡¡for¡¡example¡£¡¡
GDP¡¡is¡¡the¡¡yardstick¡¡taken¡¡to¡¡measure¡¡the¡¡economy£»¡¡even¡¡though¡¡that¡¡
doesn¡¯t¡¡necessarily¡¡say¡¡much¡¡about¡¡the¡¡level¡¡of¡¡happiness¡¡in¡¡a¡¡country¡£¡¡
There¡¡are¡¡a¡¡number¡¡of¡¡ways¡¡of¡¡paring¡¡GDP¡¡both¡¡between¡¡countries¡¡and¡¡
between¡¡time¡¡periods¡¡and£»¡¡needless¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡economists¡¡can¡¯t¡¡agree¡¡which¡¡is¡¡
best¡£¡¡
Gross¡¡domestic¡¡product¡¡
GDP¡¡is¡¡the¡¡total¡¡market¡¡value¡¡of¡¡all¡¡final¡¡goods¡¡and¡¡services¡¡produced¡¡in¡¡
a¡¡country¡¡in¡¡a¡¡one¡­year¡¡period¡£¡¡A¡¡country¡¯s¡¡balance¡¡sheet£»¡¡like¡¡that¡¡for¡¡a¡¡
business£»¡¡shows¡¡the¡¡sources¡¡and¡¡uses¡¡of¡¡funds¡£¡¡A¡¡country¡¯s¡¡GDP¡¡is¡¡usually¡¡
arrived¡¡at¡¡using¡¡the¡¡expenditure¡¡method£»¡¡using¡¡the¡¡equation¡¡GDP¡¡=¡¡
consumption¡¡£¨spending¡¡by¡¡consumers£©¡¡£«¡¡gross¡¡investment¡¡£¨spending¡¡by¡¡
business£©¡¡£«¡¡government¡¡spending¡¡£«¡¡£¨exports¡¡¨C¡¡imports£©¡£¡¡Each¡¡ponent¡¡
of¡¡expenditure¡¡plays¡¡a¡¡part¡¡in¡¡helping¡¡increase¡¡GDP¡¡and¡¡hence¡¡economic¡¡
growth¡£¡¡£¨See¡¡Keynes¡¡above¡££©¡¡
The¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡growth¡¡of¡¡GDP¡¡ma¡£¡£ers¡¡greatly¡£¡¡The¡¡UK¡¡and¡¡Europe¡¯s¡¡longrun¡¡
GDP¡¡growth¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡around¡¡2¡£5¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡will¡¡lead¡¡to¡¡a¡¡doubling¡¡of¡¡the¡¡
countries¡¯¡¡wealth¡¡in¡¡around¡¡three¡¡decades¡£¡¡China¡¡and¡¡India£»¡¡whose¡¡growth¡¡
rate¡¡routinely¡¡exceeds¡¡8¡¡per¡¡cent£»¡¡will¡¡see¡¡average¡¡wealth¡¡double¡¡in¡¡less¡¡
than¡¡one¡¡decade¡£¡¡All¡¡other¡¡things¡¡being¡¡equal£»¡¡panies¡¡looking¡¡to¡¡set¡¡up¡¡
overseas¡¡will¡¡head¡¡for¡¡the¡¡countries¡¡with¡¡rapid¡¡growth¡¡in¡¡GDP¡£¡¡
Gross¡¡domestic¡¡product¡¡per¡¡person¡¡
Measuring¡¡a¡¡country¡¯s¡¡total¡¡GDP¡¡misses¡¡an¡¡important¡¡consideration¡¡¨C¡¡the¡¡
population¡£¡¡If¡¡the¡¡growth¡¡in¡¡both¡¡GDP¡¡and¡¡population¡¡were¡¡uniform¡¡there¡¡
would¡¡be¡¡no¡¡problem£»¡¡but¡¡that¡¡is¡¡not¡¡the¡¡case¡£¡¡Britain¡¯s¡¡country¡¡GDP¡¡grew¡¡
at¡¡2¡£75¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡between¡¡2003¡¡and¡¡2007£»¡¡but¡¡as¡¡the¡¡population¡¡grew¡¡sharply¡¡
too£»¡¡GDP¡¡per¡¡person¡¡grew¡¡at¡¡a¡¡rather¡¡slower¡¡2¡£1¡¡per¡¡cent¡£¡¡Japan¡¡with¡¡its¡¡
shrinking¡¡population¡¡also¡¡grew¡¡its¡¡GDP¡¡per¡¡head¡¡by¡¡2¡£1¡¡per¡¡cent£»¡¡matching¡¡
that¡¡of¡¡Britain¡¡and¡¡beating¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡whose¡¡growth¡¡measured¡¡in¡¡
this¡¡way¡¡was¡¡only¡¡1¡£9¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡as¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡2¡£9¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡the¡¡United¡¡
States¡¡reported¡¡for¡¡the¡¡economy¡¡as¡¡a¡¡whole¡£
Economics¡¡201¡¡
Gross¡¡domestic¡¡product¡¡at¡¡purchasing¡¡power¡¡
parity¡¡£¨PPP£©¡¡
GDP£»¡¡usually¡¡referred¡¡to¡¡as¡¡nominal¡¡GDP£»¡¡is¡¡arrived¡¡at¡¡by¡¡the¡¡simple¡¡process¡¡
of¡¡adding¡¡up¡¡expenditure¡¡and¡¡does¡¡not¡¡reflect¡¡differences¡¡in¡¡the¡¡cost¡¡of¡¡
living¡¡in¡¡different¡¡countries¡¡or¡¡the¡¡currency¡¡exchange¡¡rate¡¡prevailing¡¡at¡¡the¡¡
time¡£¡¡The¡¡same¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡GDP£»¡¡in¡¡other¡¡words£»¡¡can¡¡buy¡¡a¡¡lot¡¡more¡¡goods¡¡
and¡¡services¡¡in¡¡one¡¡country¡¡than¡¡another¡£¡¡China¡¯s¡¡GDP¡¡per¡¡person¡¡is¡¡about¡¡
¡ê1£»000¡¡nominal¡¡but¡¡¡ê3£»500¡¡at¡¡PPP¡£¡¡Calculating¡¡PPP¡¡is¡¡fraught¡¡with¡¡problems¡¡
as¡¡people¡¡buy¡¡very¡¡different¡¡baskets¡¡of¡¡goods¡¡and¡¡services¡£¡¡One¡¡way¡¡round¡¡
the¡¡imperfections¡¡is¡¡to¡¡produce¡¡light¡­hearted¡¡a¡£¡£empts¡¡at¡¡showing¡¡PPP¡¡using¡¡
an¡¡external¡¡product¡¡mon¡¡to¡¡most¡¡countries¡£¡¡The¡¡Economist¡¡has¡¡published¡¡
a¡¡Big¡¡Mac¡¡Index¡¡£¨BMI£©¡¡since¡¡1986£»¡¡with¡¡a¡¡few¡¡variations¡¡such¡¡the¡¡Tall¡¡La¡£¡£e¡¡
index¡¡and¡¡a¡¡Coca¡­Cola¡¡map¡¡that¡¡showed¡¡the¡¡inverse¡¡relationship¡¡between¡¡
the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡Cola¡¡consumed¡¡per¡¡capita¡¡in¡¡a¡¡country¡¡and¡¡the¡¡general¡¡
standard¡¡of¡¡health¡£¡¡In¡¡2007£»¡¡monwealth¡¡Securities£»¡¡an¡¡Australian¡¡bank£»¡¡
created¡¡the¡¡iPod¡¡Index¡¡with¡¡much¡¡the¡¡same¡¡aim¡¡of¡¡calculating¡¡a¡¡proxy¡¡for¡¡
PPP¡¡on¡¡a¡¡country¡­by¡­country¡¡basis¡£¡¡
BUSINESS¡¡CYCLES¡¡
Economies¡¡t

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ