the+critique+of+practical+reason-µÚ1²¿·Ö
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡THE¡¡CRITIQUE¡¡OF¡¡PRACTICAL¡¡REASON
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡by¡¡Immanuel¡¡Kant
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡translated¡¡by¡¡Thomas¡¡Kingsmill¡¡Abbott
PREFACE
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡PREFACE¡£
¡¡¡¡This¡¡work¡¡is¡¡called¡¡the¡¡Critique¡¡of¡¡Practical¡¡Reason£»¡¡not¡¡of¡¡the
pure¡¡practical¡¡reason£»¡¡although¡¡its¡¡parallelism¡¡with¡¡the¡¡speculative
critique¡¡would¡¡seem¡¡to¡¡require¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡term¡£¡¡The¡¡reason¡¡of¡¡this
appears¡¡sufficiently¡¡from¡¡the¡¡treatise¡¡itself¡£¡¡Its¡¡business¡¡is¡¡to¡¡show
that¡¡there¡¡is¡¡pure¡¡practical¡¡reason£»¡¡and¡¡for¡¡this¡¡purpose¡¡it
criticizes¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡practical¡¡faculty¡¡of¡¡reason¡£¡¡If¡¡it¡¡succeeds¡¡in
this£»¡¡it¡¡has¡¡no¡¡need¡¡to¡¡criticize¡¡the¡¡pure¡¡faculty¡¡itself¡¡in¡¡order
to¡¡see¡¡whether¡¡reason¡¡in¡¡making¡¡such¡¡a¡¡claim¡¡does¡¡not¡¡presumptuously
overstep¡¡itself¡¡£¨as¡¡is¡¡the¡¡case¡¡with¡¡the¡¡speculative¡¡reason£©¡£¡¡For
if£»¡¡as¡¡pure¡¡reason£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡actually¡¡practical£»¡¡it¡¡proves¡¡its¡¡own
reality¡¡and¡¡that¡¡of¡¡its¡¡concepts¡¡by¡¡fact£»¡¡and¡¡all¡¡disputation
against¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡its¡¡being¡¡real¡¡is¡¡futile¡£
¡¡¡¡With¡¡this¡¡faculty£»¡¡transcendental¡¡freedom¡¡is¡¡also¡¡established£»
freedom£»¡¡namely£»¡¡in¡¡that¡¡absolute¡¡sense¡¡in¡¡which¡¡speculative¡¡reason
required¡¡it¡¡in¡¡its¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡causality¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to
escape¡¡the¡¡antinomy¡¡into¡¡which¡¡it¡¡inevitably¡¡falls£»¡¡when¡¡in¡¡the
chain¡¡of¡¡cause¡¡and¡¡effect¡¡it¡¡tries¡¡to¡¡think¡¡the¡¡unconditioned¡£
Speculative¡¡reason¡¡could¡¡only¡¡exhibit¡¡this¡¡concept¡¡£¨of¡¡freedom£©
problematically¡¡as¡¡not¡¡impossible¡¡to¡¡thought£»¡¡without¡¡assuring¡¡it
any¡¡objective¡¡reality£»¡¡and¡¡merely¡¡lest¡¡the¡¡supposed¡¡impossibility¡¡of
what¡¡it¡¡must¡¡at¡¡least¡¡allow¡¡to¡¡be¡¡thinkable¡¡should¡¡endanger¡¡its¡¡very
being¡¡and¡¡plunge¡¡it¡¡into¡¡an¡¡abyss¡¡of¡¡scepticism¡£
¡¡¡¡Inasmuch¡¡as¡¡the¡¡reality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom¡¡is¡¡proved¡¡by¡¡an
apodeictic¡¡law¡¡of¡¡practical¡¡reason£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡the¡¡keystone¡¡of¡¡the¡¡whole
system¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡reason£»¡¡even¡¡the¡¡speculative£»¡¡and¡¡all¡¡other¡¡concepts
£¨those¡¡of¡¡God¡¡and¡¡immortality£©¡¡which£»¡¡as¡¡being¡¡mere¡¡ideas£»¡¡remain¡¡in
it¡¡unsupported£»¡¡now¡¡attach¡¡themselves¡¡to¡¡this¡¡concept£»¡¡and¡¡by¡¡it
obtain¡¡consistence¡¡and¡¡objective¡¡reality£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡their
possibility¡¡is¡¡proved¡¡by¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡freedom¡¡actually¡¡exists£»¡¡for
this¡¡idea¡¡is¡¡revealed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡law¡£
¡¡¡¡Freedom£»¡¡however£»¡¡is¡¡the¡¡only¡¡one¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡ideas¡¡of¡¡the
speculative¡¡reason¡¡of¡¡which¡¡we¡¡know¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡£¨without£»
however£»¡¡understanding¡¡it£©£»¡¡because¡¡it¡¡is¡¡the¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡moral
law¡¡which¡¡we¡¡know¡£*¡¡The¡¡ideas¡¡of¡¡God¡¡and¡¡immortality£»¡¡however£»¡¡are¡¡not
conditions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡law£»¡¡but¡¡only¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡necessary
object¡¡of¡¡a¡¡will¡¡determined¡¡by¡¡this¡¡law£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡to¡¡say£»¡¡conditions¡¡of
the¡¡practical¡¡use¡¡of¡¡our¡¡pure¡¡reason¡£¡¡Hence£»¡¡with¡¡respect¡¡to¡¡these
ideas£»¡¡we¡¡cannot¡¡affirm¡¡that¡¡we¡¡know¡¡and¡¡understand£»¡¡I¡¡will¡¡not¡¡say
the¡¡actuality£»¡¡but¡¡even¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡them¡£¡¡However¡¡they¡¡are
the¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡application¡¡of¡¡the¡¡morally¡¡determined¡¡will¡¡to
its¡¡object£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡given¡¡to¡¡it¡¡a¡¡priori£»¡¡viz¡££»¡¡the¡¡summum¡¡bonum¡£
Consequently¡¡in¡¡this¡¡practical¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡their¡¡possibility¡¡must¡¡be
assumed£»¡¡although¡¡we¡¡cannot¡¡theoretically¡¡know¡¡and¡¡understand¡¡it¡£¡¡To
justify¡¡this¡¡assumption¡¡it¡¡is¡¡sufficient£»¡¡in¡¡a¡¡practical¡¡point¡¡of
view£»¡¡that¡¡they¡¡contain¡¡no¡¡intrinsic¡¡impossibility¡¡£¨contradiction£©¡£
Here¡¡we¡¡have¡¡what£»¡¡as¡¡far¡¡as¡¡speculative¡¡reason¡¡is¡¡concerned£»¡¡is¡¡a
merely¡¡subjective¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡assent£»¡¡which£»¡¡however£»¡¡is
objectively¡¡valid¡¡for¡¡a¡¡reason¡¡equally¡¡pure¡¡but¡¡practical£»¡¡and¡¡this
principle£»¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom£»¡¡assures¡¡objective
reality¡¡and¡¡authority¡¡to¡¡the¡¡ideas¡¡of¡¡God¡¡and¡¡immortality¡£¡¡Nay£»
there¡¡is¡¡a¡¡subjective¡¡necessity¡¡£¨a¡¡need¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡reason£©¡¡to¡¡assume
them¡£¡¡Nevertheless¡¡the¡¡theoretical¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡reason¡¡is¡¡not¡¡hereby
enlarged£»¡¡but¡¡only¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡is¡¡given£»¡¡which¡¡heretofore¡¡was
merely¡¡a¡¡problem¡¡and¡¡now¡¡bees¡¡assertion£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡the¡¡practical¡¡use
of¡¡reason¡¡is¡¡connected¡¡with¡¡the¡¡elements¡¡of¡¡theoretical¡¡reason¡£¡¡And
this¡¡need¡¡is¡¡not¡¡a¡¡merely¡¡hypothetical¡¡one¡¡for¡¡the¡¡arbitrary
purposes¡¡of¡¡speculation£»¡¡that¡¡we¡¡must¡¡assume¡¡something¡¡if¡¡we¡¡wish¡¡in
speculation¡¡to¡¡carry¡¡reason¡¡to¡¡its¡¡utmost¡¡limits£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡a¡¡need
which¡¡has¡¡the¡¡force¡¡of¡¡law¡¡to¡¡assume¡¡something¡¡without¡¡which¡¡that
cannot¡¡be¡¡which¡¡we¡¡must¡¡inevitably¡¡set¡¡before¡¡us¡¡as¡¡the¡¡aim¡¡of¡¡our
action¡£
¡¡¡¡*Lest¡¡any¡¡one¡¡should¡¡imagine¡¡that¡¡he¡¡finds¡¡an¡¡inconsistency¡¡here
when¡¡I¡¡call¡¡freedom¡¡the¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡law£»¡¡and¡¡hereafter
maintain¡¡in¡¡the¡¡treatise¡¡itself¡¡that¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡law¡¡is¡¡the¡¡condition
under¡¡which¡¡we¡¡can¡¡first¡¡bee¡¡conscious¡¡of¡¡freedom£»¡¡I¡¡will¡¡merely
remark¡¡that¡¡freedom¡¡is¡¡the¡¡ratio¡¡essendi¡¡of¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡law£»¡¡while¡¡the
moral¡¡law¡¡is¡¡the¡¡ratio¡¡cognoscendi¡¡of¡¡freedom¡£¡¡For¡¡Pad¡¡not¡¡the¡¡moral
law¡¡been¡¡previously¡¡distinctly¡¡thought¡¡in¡¡our¡¡reason£»¡¡we¡¡should
never¡¡consider¡¡ourselves¡¡justified¡¡in¡¡assuming¡¡such¡¡a¡¡thing¡¡as
freedom£»¡¡although¡¡it¡¡be¡¡not¡¡contradictory¡£¡¡But¡¡were¡¡there¡¡no¡¡freedom
it¡¡would¡¡be¡¡impossible¡¡to¡¡trace¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡law¡¡in¡¡ourselves¡¡at¡¡all¡£
¡¡¡¡It¡¡would¡¡certainly¡¡be¡¡more¡¡satisfactory¡¡to¡¡our¡¡speculative¡¡reason¡¡if
it¡¡could¡¡solve¡¡these¡¡problems¡¡for¡¡itself¡¡without¡¡this¡¡circuit¡¡and
preserve¡¡the¡¡solution¡¡for¡¡practical¡¡use¡¡as¡¡a¡¡thing¡¡to¡¡be¡¡referred
to£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡fact¡¡our¡¡faculty¡¡of¡¡speculation¡¡is¡¡not¡¡so¡¡well¡¡provided¡£
Those¡¡who¡¡boast¡¡of¡¡such¡¡high¡¡knowledge¡¡ought¡¡not¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡it¡¡back£»
but¡¡to¡¡exhibit¡¡it¡¡publicly¡¡that¡¡it¡¡may¡¡be¡¡tested¡¡and¡¡appreciated¡£¡¡They
want¡¡to¡¡prove£º¡¡very¡¡good£»¡¡let¡¡them¡¡prove£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡critical
philosophy¡¡lays¡¡its¡¡arms¡¡at¡¡their¡¡feet¡¡as¡¡the¡¡victors¡£¡¡Quid¡¡statis£¿
Nolint¡£¡¡Atqui¡¡licet¡¡esse¡¡beatis¡£¡¡As¡¡they¡¡then¡¡do¡¡not¡¡in¡¡fact¡¡choose¡¡to
do¡¡so£»¡¡probably¡¡because¡¡they¡¡cannot£»¡¡we¡¡must¡¡take¡¡up¡¡these¡¡arms
again¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡seek¡¡in¡¡the¡¡mortal¡¡use¡¡of¡¡reason£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡base¡¡on
this£»¡¡the¡¡notions¡¡of¡¡God£»¡¡freedom£»¡¡and¡¡immortality£»¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of
which¡¡speculation¡¡cannot¡¡adequately¡¡prove¡£
¡¡¡¡Here¡¡first¡¡is¡¡explained¡¡the¡¡enigma¡¡of¡¡the¡¡critical¡¡philosophy£»¡¡viz¡££º
how¡¡we¡¡deny¡¡objective¡¡reality¡¡to¡¡the¡¡supersensible¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the
categories¡¡in¡¡speculation¡¡and¡¡yet¡¡admit¡¡this¡¡reality¡¡with¡¡respect¡¡to
the¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡practical¡¡reason¡£¡¡This¡¡must¡¡at¡¡first¡¡seem
inconsistent¡¡as¡¡long¡¡as¡¡this¡¡practical¡¡use¡¡is¡¡only¡¡nominally¡¡known¡£
But¡¡when£»¡¡by¡¡a¡¡thorough¡¡analysis¡¡of¡¡it£»¡¡one¡¡bees¡¡aware¡¡that¡¡the
reality¡¡spoken¡¡of¡¡does¡¡not¡¡imply¡¡any¡¡theoretical¡¡determination¡¡of
the¡¡categories¡¡and¡¡extension¡¡of¡¡our¡¡knowledge¡¡to¡¡the¡¡supersensible£»
but¡¡that¡¡what¡¡is¡¡meant¡¡is¡¡that¡¡in¡¡this¡¡respect¡¡an¡¡object¡¡belongs¡¡to
them£»¡¡because¡¡either¡¡they¡¡are¡¡contained¡¡in¡¡the¡¡necessary¡¡determination
of¡¡the¡¡will¡¡a¡¡priori£»¡¡or¡¡are¡¡inseparably¡¡connected¡¡with¡¡its¡¡object£»
then¡¡this¡¡inconsistency¡¡disappears£»¡¡because¡¡the¡¡use¡¡we¡¡make¡¡of¡¡these
concepts¡¡is¡¡different¡¡from¡¡what¡¡speculative¡¡reason¡¡requires¡£¡¡On¡¡the
other¡¡hand£»¡¡there¡¡now¡¡appears¡¡an¡¡unexpected¡¡and¡¡very¡¡satisfactory
proof¡¡of¡¡the¡¡consistency¡¡of¡¡the¡¡speculative¡¡critical¡¡philosophy¡£¡¡For
whereas¡¡it¡¡insisted¡¡that¡¡the¡¡objects¡¡of¡¡experience¡¡as¡¡such£»
including¡¡our¡¡own¡¡subject£»¡¡have¡¡only¡¡the¡¡value¡¡of¡¡phenomena£»¡¡while
at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡things¡¡in¡¡themselves¡¡must¡¡be¡¡supposed¡¡as¡¡their¡¡basis£»
so¡¡that¡¡not¡¡everything¡¡supersensible¡¡was¡¡to¡¡be¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡a¡¡fiction
and¡¡its¡¡concept¡¡as¡¡empty£»¡¡so¡¡now¡¡practical¡¡reason¡¡itself£»¡¡without
any¡¡concert¡¡with¡¡the¡¡speculative£»¡¡assures¡¡reality¡¡to¡¡a¡¡supersensible
object¡¡of¡¡the¡¡category¡¡of¡¡causality£»¡¡viz¡££»¡¡freedom£»¡¡although¡¡£¨as
bees¡¡a¡¡practical¡¡concept£©¡¡only¡¡for¡¡practical¡¡use£»¡¡and¡¡this
establishes¡¡on¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡of¡¡a¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡which¡¡in¡¡the¡¡former¡¡case
could¡¡only¡¡be¡¡conceived¡£¡¡By¡¡this¡¡the¡¡strange¡¡but¡¡certain¡¡doctrine¡¡of
the¡¡speculative¡¡critical¡¡philosophy£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡thinking¡¡subject¡¡is¡¡to
itself¡¡in¡¡internal¡¡intuition¡¡only¡¡a¡¡phenomenon£»¡¡obtains¡¡in¡¡the
critical¡¡examination¡¡of¡¡the¡¡practical¡¡reason¡¡its¡¡full¡¡confirmation£»
and¡¡that¡¡so¡¡thoroughly¡¡that¡¡we¡¡should¡¡be¡¡pelled¡¡to¡¡adopt¡¡this
doctrine£»¡¡even¡¡if¡¡the¡¡former¡¡had¡¡never¡¡proved¡¡it¡¡at¡¡all¡£*
¡¡¡¡*The¡¡union¡¡of¡¡causality¡¡as¡¡freedom¡¡with¡¡causality¡¡as¡¡rational
mechanism£»¡¡the¡¡former¡¡established¡¡by¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡law£»¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡by
the¡¡law¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡in¡¡the¡¡same¡¡subject£»¡¡namely£»¡¡man£»¡¡is¡¡impossible£»
unless¡¡we¡¡conceive¡¡him¡¡with¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡the¡¡former¡¡as¡¡a¡¡being¡¡in
himself£»¡¡and¡¡with¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡as¡¡a¡¡phenomenon¡¡¡the
former¡¡in¡¡pure¡¡consciousness£»¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡in¡¡empirical¡¡consciousness¡£
Otherwise¡¡reason¡¡inevitably¡¡contradicts¡¡itself¡£
¡¡¡¡By¡¡this¡¡also¡¡I¡¡can¡¡understand¡¡why¡¡the¡¡most¡¡considerable¡¡objections
which¡¡I¡¡have¡¡as¡¡yet¡¡met¡¡with¡¡against¡¡the¡¡Critique¡¡turn¡¡about¡¡these¡¡two
points£»¡¡namely£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡one¡¡side£»¡¡the¡¡objective¡¡reality¡¡of¡¡the
categories¡¡as¡¡applied¡¡to¡¡noumena£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡in¡¡the¡¡theoretical
department¡¡of¡¡knowledge¡¡denied£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡practical¡¡affirmed£»¡¡and¡¡on
the¡¡other¡¡side£»¡¡the¡¡paradoxical¡¡demand¡¡to¡¡regard¡¡oneself¡¡qua¡¡subject
of¡¡freedom¡¡as¡¡a¡¡noumenon£»¡¡and¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡from¡¡the¡¡point¡¡of
view¡¡of¡¡physical¡¡nature¡¡as¡¡a¡¡phenomenon¡¡in¡¡one's¡¡own¡¡empirical
consciousness£»¡¡for¡¡as¡¡long¡¡as¡¡one¡¡has¡¡formed¡¡no¡¡definite¡¡notions¡¡of
morality¡¡and¡¡freedom£»¡¡one¡¡could¡¡not¡¡conjecture¡¡on¡¡the¡¡one¡¡side¡¡what
was¡¡intended¡¡to¡¡be¡¡the¡¡noumenon£»¡¡the¡¡basis¡¡of¡¡the¡¡alleged
phenomenon£»¡¡and¡¡on¡¡the¡¡other¡¡side¡¡it¡¡seemed¡¡doubtful¡¡whether¡¡it¡¡was¡¡at
all¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡form¡¡any¡¡notion¡¡of¡¡it£»¡¡seeing¡¡that¡¡we¡¡had¡¡previously
assigned¡¡all¡¡the¡¡notions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pure¡¡understanding¡¡in¡¡its
theoretical¡¡use¡¡exclusively¡¡to¡¡phenomena¡£¡¡Nothing¡¡but¡¡a¡¡detailed
criticism¡¡of¡¡the¡¡practical¡¡reason¡¡can¡¡remove¡¡all¡¡this
misapprehension¡¡and¡¡set¡¡in¡¡a¡¡clear¡¡light¡¡the¡¡consistency¡¡which
constitutes¡¡its¡¡greatest¡¡merit¡£
¡¡¡¡So¡¡much¡¡by¡¡way¡¡of¡¡justification¡¡of¡¡the¡¡proceeding¡¡by¡¡which£»¡¡in
this¡¡work£»¡¡the¡¡notions¡¡and¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡speculative¡¡reason¡¡which
have¡¡already¡¡undergone¡¡their¡¡special¡¡critical¡¡examination¡¡are£»¡¡now¡¡and
then£»¡¡again¡¡subjected¡¡to¡¡examination¡£¡¡This¡¡would¡¡not¡¡in¡¡other¡¡cases¡¡be
in¡¡accordance¡¡with¡¡the¡¡systematic¡¡process¡¡by¡¡which¡¡a¡¡science¡¡is
established£»¡¡since¡¡matters¡¡which¡¡have¡¡been¡¡decided¡¡ought¡¡only¡¡to¡¡be
cited¡¡and¡¡not¡¡again¡¡discussed¡£¡¡In¡¡this¡¡case£»¡¡however£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡not
only¡¡allowable¡¡but¡¡necessary£»¡¡because¡¡reason¡¡is¡¡here¡¡considered¡¡in
transition¡¡to¡¡a¡¡different¡¡use¡¡of¡¡these¡¡concepts¡¡from¡¡what¡¡it¡¡had
made¡¡of¡¡them¡¡before¡£¡¡Such¡¡a¡¡transition¡¡necessitates¡¡a¡¡parison¡¡of
the¡¡old¡¡and¡¡the¡¡new¡¡usage£»¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡distinguish¡¡well¡¡the¡¡new¡¡path
from¡¡the¡¡old¡¡one¡¡and£»¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time£»¡¡to¡¡allow¡¡their¡¡connection¡¡to
be¡¡observed¡£¡¡Accordingly¡¡considerations¡¡of¡¡this¡¡kind£»¡¡including
those¡¡which¡¡are¡¡once¡¡more¡¡directed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡fre