°Ëϲµç×ÓÊé > ¾­¹ÜÆäËûµç×ÓÊé > the+critique+of+practical+reason >

µÚ6²¿·Ö

the+critique+of+practical+reason-µÚ6²¿·Ö

С˵£º the+critique+of+practical+reason ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ4000×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



not¡¡on¡¡objective£»¡¡but¡¡on¡¡subjective¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡choice£»¡¡and¡¡hence
that¡¡they¡¡must¡¡always¡¡be¡¡represented¡¡as¡¡mere¡¡maxims£»¡¡never¡¡as
practical¡¡laws¡£¡¡This¡¡second¡¡remark¡¡seems¡¡at¡¡first¡¡sight¡¡to¡¡be¡¡mere
verbal¡¡refinement£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡defines¡¡the¡¡terms¡¡of¡¡the¡¡most¡¡important
distinction¡¡which¡¡can¡¡e¡¡into¡¡consideration¡¡in¡¡practical
investigations¡£

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡IV¡£¡¡THEOREM¡¡II¡£

¡¡¡¡A¡¡rational¡¡being¡¡cannot¡¡regard¡¡his¡¡maxims¡¡as¡¡practical¡¡universal
laws£»¡¡unless¡¡he¡¡conceives¡¡them¡¡as¡¡principles¡¡which¡¡determine¡¡the¡¡will£»
not¡¡by¡¡their¡¡matter£»¡¡but¡¡by¡¡their¡¡form¡¡only¡£
¡¡¡¡By¡¡the¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡a¡¡practical¡¡principle¡¡I¡¡mean¡¡the¡¡object¡¡of¡¡the
will¡£¡¡This¡¡object¡¡is¡¡either¡¡the¡¡determining¡¡ground¡¡of¡¡the¡¡will¡¡or¡¡it
is¡¡not¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡former¡¡case¡¡the¡¡rule¡¡of¡¡the¡¡will¡¡is¡¡subjected¡¡to¡¡an
empirical¡¡condition¡¡£¨viz¡££»¡¡the¡¡relation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡determining¡¡idea¡¡to¡¡the
feeling¡¡of¡¡pleasure¡¡and¡¡pain£©£»¡¡consequently¡¡it¡¡can¡¡not¡¡be¡¡a
practical¡¡law¡£¡¡Now£»¡¡when¡¡we¡¡abstract¡¡from¡¡a¡¡law¡¡all¡¡matter£»¡¡i¡£e¡££»
every¡¡object¡¡of¡¡the¡¡will¡¡£¨as¡¡a¡¡determining¡¡principle£©£»¡¡nothing¡¡is¡¡left
but¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡form¡¡of¡¡a¡¡universal¡¡legislation¡£¡¡Therefore£»¡¡either¡¡a
rational¡¡being¡¡cannot¡¡conceive¡¡his¡¡subjective¡¡practical¡¡principles£»
that¡¡is£»¡¡his¡¡maxims£»¡¡as¡¡being¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡universal¡¡laws£»¡¡or¡¡he
must¡¡suppose¡¡that¡¡their¡¡mere¡¡form£»¡¡by¡¡which¡¡they¡¡are¡¡fitted¡¡for
universal¡¡legislation£»¡¡is¡¡alone¡¡what¡¡makes¡¡them¡¡practical¡¡laws¡£

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡REMARK¡£

¡¡¡¡The¡¡monest¡¡understanding¡¡can¡¡distinguish¡¡without¡¡instruction¡¡what
form¡¡of¡¡maxim¡¡is¡¡adapted¡¡for¡¡universal¡¡legislation£»¡¡and¡¡what¡¡is¡¡not¡£
Suppose£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡that¡¡I¡¡have¡¡made¡¡it¡¡my¡¡maxim¡¡to¡¡increase¡¡my
fortune¡¡by¡¡every¡¡safe¡¡means¡£¡¡Now£»¡¡I¡¡have¡¡a¡¡deposit¡¡in¡¡my¡¡hands£»¡¡the
owner¡¡of¡¡which¡¡is¡¡dead¡¡and¡¡has¡¡left¡¡no¡¡writing¡¡about¡¡it¡£¡¡This¡¡is
just¡¡the¡¡case¡¡for¡¡my¡¡maxim¡£¡¡I¡¡desire¡¡then¡¡to¡¡know¡¡whether¡¡that¡¡maxim
can¡¡also¡¡bold¡¡good¡¡as¡¡a¡¡universal¡¡practical¡¡law¡£¡¡I¡¡apply¡¡it£»
therefore£»¡¡to¡¡the¡¡present¡¡case£»¡¡and¡¡ask¡¡whether¡¡it¡¡could¡¡take¡¡the¡¡form
of¡¡a¡¡law£»¡¡and¡¡consequently¡¡whether¡¡I¡¡can¡¡by¡¡my¡¡maxim¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same
time¡¡give¡¡such¡¡a¡¡law¡¡as¡¡this£»¡¡that¡¡everyone¡¡may¡¡deny¡¡a¡¡deposit¡¡of
which¡¡no¡¡one¡¡can¡¡produce¡¡a¡¡proof¡£¡¡I¡¡at¡¡once¡¡bee¡¡aware¡¡that¡¡such¡¡a
principle£»¡¡viewed¡¡as¡¡a¡¡law£»¡¡would¡¡annihilate¡¡itself£»¡¡because¡¡the
result¡¡would¡¡be¡¡that¡¡there¡¡would¡¡be¡¡no¡¡deposits¡£¡¡A¡¡practical¡¡law¡¡which
I¡¡recognise¡¡as¡¡such¡¡must¡¡be¡¡qualified¡¡for¡¡universal¡¡legislation£»
this¡¡is¡¡an¡¡identical¡¡proposition¡¡and£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡self¡­evident¡£¡¡Now£»¡¡if
I¡¡say¡¡that¡¡my¡¡will¡¡is¡¡subject¡¡to¡¡a¡¡practical¡¡law£»¡¡I¡¡cannot¡¡adduce¡¡my
inclination¡¡£¨e¡£g¡££»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡present¡¡case¡¡my¡¡avarice£©¡¡as¡¡a¡¡principle¡¡of
determination¡¡fitted¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡universal¡¡practical¡¡law£»¡¡for¡¡this¡¡is¡¡so
far¡¡from¡¡being¡¡fitted¡¡for¡¡a¡¡universal¡¡legislation¡¡that£»¡¡if¡¡put¡¡in
the¡¡form¡¡of¡¡a¡¡universal¡¡law£»¡¡it¡¡would¡¡destroy¡¡itself¡£
¡¡¡¡It¡¡is£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡surprising¡¡that¡¡intelligent¡¡men¡¡could¡¡have¡¡thought
of¡¡calling¡¡the¡¡desire¡¡of¡¡happiness¡¡a¡¡universal¡¡practical¡¡law¡¡on¡¡the
ground¡¡that¡¡the¡¡desire¡¡is¡¡universal£»¡¡and£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡also¡¡the¡¡maxim¡¡by
which¡¡everyone¡¡makes¡¡this¡¡desire¡¡determine¡¡his¡¡will¡£¡¡For¡¡whereas¡¡in
other¡¡cases¡¡a¡¡universal¡¡law¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡makes¡¡everything¡¡harmonious£»
here£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contrary£»¡¡if¡¡we¡¡attribute¡¡to¡¡the¡¡maxim¡¡the¡¡universality
of¡¡a¡¡law£»¡¡the¡¡extreme¡¡opposite¡¡of¡¡harmony¡¡will¡¡follow£»¡¡the¡¡greatest
opposition¡¡and¡¡the¡¡plete¡¡destruction¡¡of¡¡the¡¡maxim¡¡itself¡¡and¡¡its
purpose¡£¡¡For£»¡¡in¡¡that¡¡case£»¡¡the¡¡will¡¡of¡¡all¡¡has¡¡not¡¡one¡¡and¡¡the¡¡same
object£»¡¡but¡¡everyone¡¡has¡¡his¡¡own¡¡£¨his¡¡private¡¡welfare£©£»¡¡which¡¡may
accidentally¡¡accord¡¡with¡¡the¡¡purposes¡¡of¡¡others¡¡which¡¡are¡¡equally
selfish£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡far¡¡from¡¡sufficing¡¡for¡¡a¡¡law£»¡¡because¡¡the
occasional¡¡exceptions¡¡which¡¡one¡¡is¡¡permitted¡¡to¡¡make¡¡are¡¡endless£»
and¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡definitely¡¡embraced¡¡in¡¡one¡¡universal¡¡rule¡£¡¡In¡¡this
manner£»¡¡then£»¡¡results¡¡a¡¡harmony¡¡like¡¡that¡¡which¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡satirical
poem¡¡depicts¡¡as¡¡existing¡¡between¡¡a¡¡married¡¡couple¡¡bent¡¡on¡¡going¡¡to
ruin£»¡¡¡¨O£»¡¡marvellous¡¡harmony£»¡¡what¡¡he¡¡wishes£»¡¡she¡¡wishes¡¡also¡¨£»¡¡or
like¡¡what¡¡is¡¡said¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pledge¡¡of¡¡Francis¡¡I¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Emperor¡¡Charles¡¡V£»
¡¨What¡¡my¡¡brother¡¡Charles¡¡wishes¡¡that¡¡I¡¡wish¡¡also¡¨¡¡£¨viz¡££»¡¡Milan£©¡£
Empirical¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡determination¡¡are¡¡not¡¡fit¡¡for¡¡any¡¡universal
external¡¡legislation£»¡¡but¡¡just¡¡as¡¡little¡¡for¡¡internal£»¡¡for¡¡each¡¡man
makes¡¡his¡¡own¡¡subject¡¡the¡¡foundation¡¡of¡¡his¡¡inclination£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the
same¡¡subject¡¡sometimes¡¡one¡¡inclination£»¡¡sometimes¡¡another£»¡¡has¡¡the
preponderance¡£¡¡To¡¡discover¡¡a¡¡law¡¡which¡¡would¡¡govern¡¡them¡¡all¡¡under
this¡¡condition£»¡¡namely£»¡¡bringing¡¡them¡¡all¡¡into¡¡harmony£»¡¡is¡¡quite
impossible¡£

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡V¡£¡¡PROBLEM¡¡I¡£

¡¡¡¡Supposing¡¡that¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡legislative¡¡form¡¡of¡¡maxims¡¡is¡¡alone¡¡the
sufficient¡¡determining¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡a¡¡will£»¡¡to¡¡find¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of
the¡¡will¡¡which¡¡can¡¡be¡¡determined¡¡by¡¡it¡¡alone¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡Since¡¡the¡¡bare¡¡form¡¡of¡¡the¡¡law¡¡can¡¡only¡¡be¡¡conceived¡¡by¡¡reason£»¡¡and
is£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡not¡¡an¡¡object¡¡of¡¡the¡¡senses£»¡¡and¡¡consequently¡¡does
not¡¡belong¡¡to¡¡the¡¡class¡¡of¡¡phenomena£»¡¡it¡¡follows¡¡that¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of
it£»¡¡which¡¡determines¡¡the¡¡will£»¡¡is¡¡distinct¡¡from¡¡all¡¡the¡¡principles
that¡¡determine¡¡events¡¡in¡¡nature¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡law¡¡of¡¡causality£»
because¡¡in¡¡their¡¡case¡¡the¡¡determining¡¡principles¡¡must¡¡themselves¡¡be
phenomena¡£¡¡Now£»¡¡if¡¡no¡¡other¡¡determining¡¡principle¡¡can¡¡serve¡¡as¡¡a¡¡law
for¡¡the¡¡will¡¡except¡¡that¡¡universal¡¡legislative¡¡form£»¡¡such¡¡a¡¡will
must¡¡be¡¡conceived¡¡as¡¡quite¡¡independent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡natural¡¡law¡¡of¡¡phenomena
in¡¡their¡¡mutual¡¡relation£»¡¡namely£»¡¡the¡¡law¡¡of¡¡causality£»¡¡such
independence¡¡is¡¡called¡¡freedom¡¡in¡¡the¡¡strictest£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡in¡¡the
transcendental£»¡¡sense£»¡¡consequently£»¡¡a¡¡will¡¡which¡¡can¡¡have¡¡its¡¡law
in¡¡nothing¡¡but¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡legislative¡¡form¡¡of¡¡the¡¡maxim¡¡is¡¡a¡¡free¡¡will¡£

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡VI¡£¡¡PROBLEM¡¡II¡£

¡¡¡¡Supposing¡¡that¡¡a¡¡will¡¡is¡¡free£»¡¡to¡¡find¡¡the¡¡law¡¡which¡¡alone¡¡is
petent¡¡to¡¡determine¡¡it¡¡necessarily¡£
¡¡¡¡Since¡¡the¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡the¡¡practical¡¡law£»¡¡i¡£e¡££»¡¡an¡¡object¡¡of¡¡the¡¡maxim£»
can¡¡never¡¡be¡¡given¡¡otherwise¡¡than¡¡empirically£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡free¡¡will¡¡is
independent¡¡on¡¡empirical¡¡conditions¡¡£¨that¡¡is£»¡¡conditions¡¡belonging
to¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense£©¡¡and¡¡yet¡¡is¡¡determinable£»¡¡consequently¡¡a¡¡free
will¡¡must¡¡find¡¡its¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡determination¡¡in¡¡the¡¡law£»¡¡and¡¡yet
independently¡¡of¡¡the¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡the¡¡law¡£¡¡But£»¡¡besides¡¡the¡¡matter¡¡of¡¡the
law£»¡¡nothing¡¡is¡¡contained¡¡in¡¡it¡¡except¡¡the¡¡legislative¡¡form¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡the
legislative¡¡form£»¡¡then£»¡¡contained¡¡in¡¡the¡¡maxim£»¡¡which¡¡can¡¡alone
constitute¡¡a¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡determination¡¡of¡¡the¡¡£§free£§¡¡will¡£

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡REMARK¡£

¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡freedom¡¡and¡¡an¡¡unconditional¡¡practical¡¡law¡¡reciprocally¡¡imply
each¡¡other¡£¡¡Now¡¡I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡ask¡¡here¡¡whether¡¡they¡¡are¡¡in¡¡fact¡¡distinct£»
or¡¡whether¡¡an¡¡unconditioned¡¡law¡¡is¡¡not¡¡rather¡¡merely¡¡the¡¡consciousness
of¡¡a¡¡pure¡¡practical¡¡reason¡¡and¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡identical¡¡with¡¡the
positive¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom£»¡¡I¡¡only¡¡ask£»¡¡whence¡¡begins¡¡our¡¡knowledge
of¡¡the¡¡unconditionally¡¡practical£»¡¡whether¡¡it¡¡is¡¡from¡¡freedom¡¡or¡¡from
the¡¡practical¡¡law£¿¡¡Now¡¡it¡¡cannot¡¡begin¡¡from¡¡freedom£»¡¡for¡¡of¡¡this¡¡we
cannot¡¡be¡¡immediately¡¡conscious£»¡¡since¡¡the¡¡first¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡it¡¡is
negative£»¡¡nor¡¡can¡¡we¡¡infer¡¡it¡¡from¡¡experience£»¡¡for¡¡experience¡¡gives¡¡us
the¡¡knowledge¡¡only¡¡of¡¡the¡¡law¡¡of¡¡phenomena£»¡¡and¡¡hence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mechanism
of¡¡nature£»¡¡the¡¡direct¡¡opposite¡¡of¡¡freedom¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡therefore¡¡the¡¡moral
law£»¡¡of¡¡which¡¡we¡¡bee¡¡directly¡¡conscious¡¡£¨as¡¡soon¡¡as¡¡we¡¡trace¡¡for
ourselves¡¡maxims¡¡of¡¡the¡¡will£©£»¡¡that¡¡first¡¡presents¡¡itself¡¡to¡¡us£»¡¡and
leads¡¡directly¡¡to¡¡the¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡freedom£»¡¡inasmuch¡¡as¡¡reason
presents¡¡it¡¡as¡¡a¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡determination¡¡not¡¡to¡¡be¡¡outweighed¡¡by
any¡¡sensible¡¡conditions£»¡¡nay£»¡¡wholly¡¡independent¡¡of¡¡them¡£¡¡But¡¡how¡¡is
the¡¡consciousness£»¡¡of¡¡that¡¡moral¡¡law¡¡possible£¿¡¡We¡¡can¡¡bee¡¡conscious
of¡¡pure¡¡practical¡¡laws¡¡just¡¡as¡¡we¡¡are¡¡conscious¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡theoretical
principles£»¡¡by¡¡attending¡¡to¡¡the¡¡necessity¡¡with¡¡which¡¡reason¡¡prescribes
them¡¡and¡¡to¡¡the¡¡elimination¡¡of¡¡all¡¡empirical¡¡conditions£»¡¡which¡¡it
directs¡£¡¡The¡¡concept¡¡of¡¡a¡¡pure¡¡will¡¡arises¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡former£»¡¡as
that¡¡of¡¡a¡¡pure¡¡understanding¡¡arises¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡latter¡£¡¡That¡¡this¡¡is
the¡¡true¡¡subordination¡¡of¡¡our¡¡concepts£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡morality¡¡that
first¡¡discovers¡¡to¡¡us¡¡the¡¡notion¡¡of¡¡freedom£»¡¡hence¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is
practical¡¡reason¡¡which£»¡¡with¡¡this¡¡concept£»¡¡first¡¡proposes¡¡to
speculative¡¡reason¡¡the¡¡most¡¡insoluble¡¡problem£»¡¡thereby¡¡placing¡¡it¡¡in
the¡¡greatest¡¡perplexity£»¡¡is¡¡evident¡¡from¡¡the¡¡following
consideration£º¡¡Since¡¡nothing¡¡in¡¡phenomena¡¡can¡¡be¡¡explained¡¡by¡¡the
concept¡¡of¡¡freedom£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡mechanism¡¡of¡¡nature¡¡must¡¡constitute¡¡the
only¡¡clue£»¡¡moreover£»¡¡when¡¡pure¡¡reason¡¡tries¡¡to¡¡ascend¡¡in¡¡the¡¡series¡¡of
causes¡¡to¡¡the¡¡unconditioned£»¡¡it¡¡falls¡¡into¡¡an¡¡antinomy¡¡which¡¡is
entangled¡¡in¡¡inprehensibilities¡¡on¡¡the¡¡one¡¡side¡¡as¡¡much¡¡as¡¡the
other£»¡¡whilst¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡£¨namely£»¡¡mechanism£©¡¡is¡¡at¡¡least¡¡useful¡¡in¡¡the
explanation¡¡of¡¡phenomena£»¡¡therefore¡¡no¡¡one¡¡would¡¡ever¡¡have¡¡been¡¡so
rash¡¡as¡¡to¡¡introduce¡¡freedom¡¡into¡¡science£»¡¡had¡¡not¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡law£»
and¡¡with¡¡it¡¡practical¡¡reason£»¡¡e¡¡in¡¡and¡¡forced¡¡this¡¡notion¡¡upon
us¡£¡¡Experience£»¡¡however£»¡¡confirms¡¡this¡¡order¡¡of¡¡notions¡£¡¡Suppose
some¡¡one¡¡asserts¡¡of¡¡his¡¡lustful¡¡appetite¡¡that£»¡¡when¡¡the¡¡desired¡¡object
and¡¡the¡¡opportunity¡¡are¡¡present£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡quite¡¡irresistible¡£¡¡£§Ask
him£§¡­¡¡if¡¡a¡¡gallows¡¡were¡¡erected¡¡before¡¡the¡¡house¡¡where¡¡he¡¡finds¡¡this
opportunity£»¡¡in¡¡order¡¡that¡¡he¡¡should¡¡be¡¡hanged¡¡thereon¡¡immediately
after¡¡the¡¡gratification¡¡of¡¡his¡¡lust£»¡¡whether¡¡he¡¡could¡¡not¡¡then¡¡control
his¡¡passion£»¡¡we¡¡need¡¡not¡¡be¡¡long¡¡in¡¡doubt¡¡what¡¡he¡¡would¡¡reply¡£¡¡Ask
him£»¡¡however¡­¡¡if¡¡his¡¡sovereign¡¡ordered¡¡him£»¡¡on¡¡pain¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same
immediate¡¡execution£»¡¡to¡¡bear¡¡false¡¡witness¡¡against¡¡an¡¡honourable
man£»¡¡whom¡¡the¡¡prince¡¡might¡¡wish¡¡to¡¡destroy¡¡under¡¡a¡¡plausible
pretext£»¡¡would¡¡he¡¡consider¡¡it¡¡possible¡¡in¡¡that¡¡case¡¡to¡¡overe¡¡his
love¡¡of¡¡life£»¡¡however¡¡great¡¡it¡¡may¡¡be¡£¡¡He¡¡would¡¡perhaps¡¡not¡¡venture¡¡to
affirm¡¡whether¡¡he¡¡would¡¡do¡¡so¡¡or¡¡not£»¡¡but¡¡he¡¡must¡¡unhesitatingly¡¡admit
that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡do¡¡so¡£¡¡He¡¡judges£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡that¡¡he¡¡can¡¡do¡¡a
certain¡¡thing¡¡because¡¡he¡¡is¡¡conscious¡¡that¡¡he¡¡ought£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡recognizes
that¡¡he¡¡is¡¡free¡­¡¡a¡¡fact¡¡which¡¡but¡¡for¡¡the¡¡moral¡¡law¡¡he¡¡would¡¡never
have¡¡known¡£

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡VII¡£¡¡FUNDAMENTAL¡¡LAW¡¡OF¡¡THE¡¡PURE¡¡PRACTICAL¡¡REASON¡£

¡¡¡¡Act¡¡so¡¡that¡¡the¡¡maxim¡¡of¡¡thy¡¡will¡¡can¡¡always¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡hold
good¡¡as¡¡a¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡universal¡¡legislation¡£

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡REMARK¡£

¡¡¡¡Pure¡¡geometry¡¡has¡¡postulates¡¡which¡¡are¡¡practical¡¡propositions£»¡¡but
contain¡¡nothing¡¡further¡¡than¡¡the¡¡assumption¡¡that¡¡we¡¡can¡¡do¡¡something
if¡¡it¡¡is¡¡required¡¡that¡¡we¡¡

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ